Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income-tax, Central, Bombay Vs. Indore Malwa United Mi ...
Mumbai
Sep-12-1959
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 4(1)
[1960]39ITR438(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
Shah, J. 1. The dispute in this reference relates to assessment years 1943-44, 1944-45, 1945-46, 1946-47, 1947-48, and 1948-49. The assessee is a limited company having offices at Bombay and Indore, and has a factory for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South Vs. N.T. Patwardhan
Mumbai
Apr-26-1960
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10
[1961]41ITR313(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
V.S. Desai, J.1. In this reference, which the Tribunal has made to us under section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, the point in dispute is whether the receipt of the sale proceeds of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-i Vs. Gaekwar Foam and Rubber ...
Mumbai
Oct-03-1958
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15C, 80J and 84
[1959]35ITR662(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
S.T. Desai, J.1. A short but interesting question of construction of section 15C of the Income-tax Act arises for our determination on this reference, which comes before us at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Chugandas and Co. (Secur ...
Mumbai
Sep-23-1957
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10 and 25(3); Income Tax Act, 1918
AIR1960Bom109; [1960]38ITR241(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
Tendolkar, J.1. The question referred to this court upon this reference is : 'Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case interest received on securities held by the assessee formed part of the assessee's business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. Purshottamdas Thakurdas
Mumbai
Jul-03-1959
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 18A, 18A(2), 18(5) and 18(6)
(1959)61BOMLR1521
G.N. Joshi and ;R.J. Joshi, Advs.
Shah, J. (1) The assessee has a large divided income beside income from securities, property, business and other sources. By notice under section 18A (1) of the Income-tax Act the assessee was called upon to make...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Shoorji Vallabhdas and C ...
Mumbai
Oct-01-1958
Direct Taxation
Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)
[1959]36ITR25(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
S.T. Desai, J. 1. This reference raises a question of some difficulty and importance and the income in dispute relates to managing agency commission. In the matter out of which it arises there was a difference...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Indo-aden Salt Works Co.
Mumbai
Oct-28-1958
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 25(4) and 31
[1959]36ITR429(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
S.T. Desai, J.1. A very unusual question arises for our determination on this reference and ultimately the question is whether the Tribunal in the order which is before us has stated what it meant or has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Purshottamdas Thakurdas
Mumbai
Mar-03-1959
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 18, 18A(1), 18A(2) and 18A(6)
AIR1960Bom347; [1960]38ITR462(Bom)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
Shah, J.1. The assessee has a large dividend income besides income from securities, property, business and other sources. By notice under section 18A(11) of the Income-tax Act the assessee was called upon to make advance payment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat Vs. Bai Vina
Gujarat
Oct-22-1964
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(6A), 10(I) and 10(2)
(1965)0GLR583; [1965]58ITR100(Guj)
G.N. Joshi, Adv.
Bhagwati, J.1. An interesting question of construction of section 2(6A)(c) of the Income-tax Act arises on this reference. The reference relates to the assessment of the assessee, an individual, for the assessment year 1956-57, the corresponding...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.M. Kashiparekh and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay N ...
Mumbai
Apr-02-1960
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2), 33-B1 and 34
AIR1961Bom84
N.A. Palkhiwalla and ;S.B. Kher, Advs., ;i/b., Manilal Kher Ambalal and Co.
S.T. Desai, J.1. This Reference raises a question of some importance and the income under assessment relates to managing agency commission. It is a trite saying that income-tax is not and cannot be cast on logical...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »