Advanced Search Results
Thambi Nasir and Etc. Etc. Vs. State
Mumbai
Sep-28-2001
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376 and 395
2003CriLJ493
G. Kanekar, ;Tema Dhime, ;Ratna Parbhu and ;A.A. Agni, Advs. (in Cri. A. Nos. 31, 32, 34 and 38/2000)
P.V. Hardas, J.1. Appellant-Thambi Nasir in Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 2000 (original accused No. 1), appellant-Mehboob Nadaf in Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 2000 (original accused No. 3), appellant-Babu Shaikh in Criminal Appeal No. 32...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. Ganpat Singh S/O Shri Kalyan Singh Vs. State of Goa Represented by ...
Mumbai
Aug-20-2004
Criminal
(2005)107BOMLR381
N.A. Britto, J.1. The appellant herein challenges the conviction and sentence imposed upon him by the learned Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, vide judgment and order dated 17/25th November, 2003.2. The case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Vaishya Urban Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. Represented through ...
Mumbai Goa
Jul-01-2015
MRTP
Oral Judgment: 1. By this appeal the appellant â“ complainant is challenging the acquittal of the respondent from the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred as to 'the Act'). 2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›