Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g k potey · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.035 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 1985

Tantrik Shikshan Karmachari Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-1985

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 5, 6 and 6(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 1986(2)BomCR504

Advocate for Appellant : V.G and M.G. Bhangde, Advs.

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 2-12-82, rejecting the plaintiff's application (Ex. 12) for amendment of the plaint, passed by the 16th Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nagpur, in Regular Civil Suit No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 1978

inayat HussaIn Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-04-1978

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 281; Income Tax Rules - Rules 2 and 51

Reported in : [1980]122ITR227(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Potey, Adv.

Tulpule, J.1. These two appeals against an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, raise common question of law and facts. They are, therefore, being heard and decided together. 2. Special Civil Suit No. 237...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1974

Patel Stone Trading Co. Vs. Ramsing

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-22-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 2(5); Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 13 - Schedule - Article 54

Reported in : AIR1975Bom79; 1974MhLJ616

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Potey, Adv.

1. The plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of the amount on the ground that the non-applicant committed a breach of agreement and also for damages for wrongful removal of the truck. In that suit the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 02 1988

Harivansh S/O Vallabhdasji Battad and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-02-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Tribals Economic Condition (Improvement) Act, 1976 - Sections 5 to 8, 11 and 14; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31C and 304; Validity of Tribals Economic Condition Act

Reported in : 1988(4)BomCR553

Advocate for Appellant : G.K. Potey, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. In these six petitions, the validity of the Maharashtra Tribals Economic Condition (Improvement) Act, 1976 ( the Act) is questioned.2. Preamble gives the aims and objects and also the background of the Act....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial