Advanced Search Results

Godrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Municipal Commissioner

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR747

Vaidya, J.1. The above 173 appeals arc filed under Section 218D of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act against an order dated June 5, 1964, passed by the Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes at Bombay, dismissing...

Union Bank of India Vs. Byram Pestonji Gariwala and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 47 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 4, Order 21, Rules 22 and 23(1) - Order 23, Rule 3, Order 43, Rules 1A(2) and Order 23, Rules 3 and 3A - Order LXIII; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 409, 467 and 477A

Reported in : AIR1991Bom185; 1991(1)BomCR575; (1991)93BOMLR944; 1991(1)MhLj104

Advocate for Appellant : N.V. Vimadalal and ;P.V. Shah, Advs.

This Chamber Summons involves certain interesting and important questions of law. The questions involved in this proceeding for consideration of the Court are as under:(1) Whether the consent decree is a nullity in case the consent...

Usha Arvind Dongre Vs. Suresh Raghunath Kotwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesArbitration

Acts : Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 14; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 - Rule 10

Reported in : 1990(3)BomCR389; (1989)91BOMLR233

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Desai, Adv. i/b., Gordhandas & Fozdar

Sujata Manohar, J.1. This is a petition to set aside the Arbitration Award No. 94 of 1988 which is dated 30th June, 1988 and is filed in this Court. The petitioner and the respondent are sister...

Prakash Cotton Mills Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1990(28)LC83(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Desai

S.C. Pratap, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks to challenge order dated 17th January 1981 of the Export Commissioner dismissing the petitioners' appeal against order dated 15th February 1980 passed by the...

Sheroo Minoo Engineer Vs. Minoo Jehangir Engineer

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1987)89BOMLR139

Sujata Manohar, J.1. The present appeal is in respect of judgment and decree of the learned trial judge in a suit which is filed by the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against the appellant...

Focus Advertising Private Ltd. Vs. Ahoora Blocks Private Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 447, 537 and 557

Reported in : [1975]45CompCas534(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Dhanuka, Adv. for appellants-company, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for respondents-original petitioners, ;G.J. Desai, Adv. for Wagle Process Studio & Press Ltd. -supporting creditors, ;C.M. Khorde, Adv.

Mukhi, J.1. This is an appeal from the order of winding up passed by the learned company judge (Vimadalal J.) whereby he ordered that the company, Messrs. Focus Advertising Private Ltd., be wound up under the...

Shree Jaya Mahal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. M/S. Zenith Che ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1991Bom211; 1991(3)BomCR201; (1991)93BOMLR881

Advocate for Appellant : G.J. Desai and ;S.G. Walam, Advs., i/by ;M/s. Gordhandas and; Fozdar

ORDER1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution take exception to an order passed by the then Minister of State for Agriculture and Co-operation -- being respondent No. 2 to the petitions -- purporting to...

Chhaganlal Nathubhai Patel Vs. Bhagirath Kheraji and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 1993ACJ1152

Advocate for Appellant : G.J. Desai, ;S.C. Dharmadhikari, ;Gordhandas and ; Fozdar, Advs.

S.M. Daud, J.1. This appeal takes exception to the quantum of compensation granted by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal at Thane.2. The appellant, Chhaganlal Nathubhai Patel, is a person of Indian origin who has acquired British...

Arjandas Naraindas Adnani Vs. Narsingdas Naraindas Adnani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1997Bom20; 1997(1)BomCR509; (1996)98BOMLR494

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Shah and ;G.J. Desai, Advs. i/by ;I.S. Khemani

ORDERDr. B.P. Saraf, J. 1. The sole controversy in these appeals is whether Court can award interest under S. 29 of the Arbitration Act from the 'date of the award' or it can be awarded only...

In Re: Focus Advertising Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 346, 433, 434(1) and 557(1)

Reported in : [1974]44CompCas567(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : G. J. Desai, ;D. R. Zaiwala and ;D. R. Dhanuka, Advs.;R. J. Bhatt, Adv.

Vimadalal, J.1. This is a winding-up petition filed against a company named focus Advertising Pvt. Ltd., on the ground of non-compliance with a statutory notice under section 434(1)9a) read with section 433(e) of the Companies Act,...