Advanced Search Results
Chandra Ballabh and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr.
Delhi
Dec-18-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999IIAD(Delhi)838; 77(1999)DLT327; 1999(48)DRJ23
Mr. G.D. Gupta, Adv
Vijender Jain, J.1.Two writ petitioners aggrieved by the selection of respondent No. 2 to the post of Commissioner (Planning) by the respondent No.1 has filed the present writ petition. Mr. G.D. Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLeela Chopra and anr. Vs. Surinder Pal Singh and ors.
Delhi
Nov-25-1988
Service
Constitution of India - Article 309; Indian Railways Establishment Code - Rules 106, 108, 111, 123, 302, 311 and 312
38(1989)DLT40; [1989(59)FLR249]
G.D. Gupta,; M.S. Mann,; A.K. Dey and;
S.S. Chadha, J.(1) The challenge in this appeal relates to the cadre of telephone operators and to the cadre of clerks and their seniority on the merger of the two cadres and/or on transfer/absorption from one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollege Section Officers Association and ors. Vs. University of Delhi ...
Delhi
Jul-13-1999
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Article 226
2000IIIAD(Delhi)503; 2000(56)DRJ1
Mr. G.D. Gupta and; Mr. Pramod Gupta, Advs
ORDERK.Ramamoorthy, J.1. There are ten petitioners. The first petitioner is The 'College Section Officers' Association (University of Delhi). Petitioner No. 2 is Delhi University Section Officers' Association. Petitioner No. 3 is Delhi University & College Karamchari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mrs. Usha Saini Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Jul-09-2007
Service
Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1) and 13; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 100; Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226
142(2007)DLT397
G.D. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; S.N. Gupta, Adv
Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the result of the DPC held on 17.2.2006 whereby the petitioner was declared not suitable for the post of Principal. The petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarbada Kannan Vs. Delhi Administration
Delhi
Apr-22-1998
Constitution
1998IVAD(Delhi)521; 74(1998)DLT198
Mr.G.D. Gupta and ;Mr. Pramod Gupta Advs.
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner was appointed as Crafts Teacher in the third Respndent. She was holding diploma of Craftsmanship issued by the Director General of Resettlement and Employment, Ministry of Labour and Employment. In the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.D. Verma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Mar-18-2011
Land Acquisition
Mr. G.D. Gupta; Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advs.
1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No1. Invoking the jurisdiction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.D. Kaushik Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Mar-18-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227
Mr. G.D. Gupta; Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advs.
1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? No3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No1. Invoking the jurisdiction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Gupta (Dr.) Vs. Dr. Shroffs Charity Eye Hospital
Delhi
Jul-15-1999
ServiceConstitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
85(2000)DLT27; 2000(53)DRJ399
Mr. G.D. Gupta and; Mr. Pramod Gupta, Advs
ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs in the writ petition against the respondent:- a) issue a writ of certiorari quashing the clause whereby the management has reserved the right to terminate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar Sharma Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Delhi
Nov-02-1995
Service
60(1995)DLT739
G.D. Gupta, Adv
Vijender Jain, J.(1) This petition challenges the validity of the resolutions of Executive Council dated 29.4.75 and 28.4.76. (2) Mr. G.D. Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner was to be assigned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.B. Mathur Vs. Union of India
Delhi
Oct-28-1997
Service
1997VIAD(Delhi)1042; 1998(44)DRJ355
G.D. Gupta and ; Vinay Bhasin, Advs
Usha Mehra, J.(1) The Short points involved in this writ petition are (i) whether the rule which provides promotion on seniority-cum-merit would mean comparative merit only or seniority and then merit. (ii) whether the decision of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »