Advanced Search Results
Fifth Wealth-tax Officer Vs. Abdul Qadar Adam and Another
Karnataka
Mar-11-1990
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17(1)
ILR1990KAR2863; [1990]186ITR549(KAR); [1990]186ITR549(Karn)
G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
M. Rama Jois, J. 1. These two writ appeals are presented by the Wealth-tax Officer aggrieved by the order of the learned single judge (see [1987] 168 ITR 420) allowing the writ petitions presented by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCanara Rubber Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Ex ...
Karnataka
Jul-29-1982
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B and 11B(2); Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226; Indian Contract Act - Sections 72
1983LC51D(Karnataka); 1983(12)ELT97(Kar); 1983(1)KarLJ289
G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
ORDER1. This petition is disposed of by the following order at the stage of preliminary hearing after notice to respondents and after hearing the Counsel for parties. 2. The facts leading to this petition briefly stated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGolden Press Vs. Deputy Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad and anr ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-19-1985
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 35; Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 18
1986(9)ECC317; 1985LC1001(AP); 1987(27)ELT273(AP)
G. Chandrakumar and ;V. Lakshmidevi, Advs.
Jeevan Reddy, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the orders of the Collector, Central Excise, Hyderabad, dated 4-8-1981, passed by him in exercise of his power of review under Section 35A of the Central Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Khoday Eswarsa and Sons Vs. Commisioner of Gift-tax
Karnataka
Mar-16-1990
Direct Taxation
Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 4(1), 5(1), 6(2) and 21
(1990)86CTR(Kar)250; ILR1990KAR2403; [1990]186ITR388(KAR); [1990]186ITR388(Karn)
Sarangan, Adv.
S.R. Rajasekhapa Murthy, J. 1. These references arise under section 26 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 ('the Act' for short). T.R.C. Nos. 66 and 67 of 1982 are references under section 26(1) of the act made...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsstt. Collector of Central Excise, Mysore Vs. Belur Enterprises
Karnataka
Aug-13-1991
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9A
1995(75)ELT224(Kar); ILR1991KAR3215; 1992(1)KarLJ292
Shri Ashok Haranahalli, C.G.S.C.
ORDERS. Mohan, C.J. 1. This writ appeal raises an interesting question which will be apparent from the following narration. The respondent M/s. Belur Enterprises is a manufacturer of Sodium Alginate. With effect from 28-2-1982, this product...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Vs. Belur Enterprises
Karnataka
Aug-13-1991
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9A and 223B; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2 and 11A
1994LC468(Karnataka); 1992(58)ELT61(Kar)
Shri Ashok Haranahalli, Central Govt. Standing Counsel
ORDER1. This writ appeal raises an interesting question which will be apparent from the following narration. The respondent M/s. Belur Enterprises is a manufacturer of Sodium Alginate. With effect from 28-2-1982, this product was brought to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Kirloskar Computer Service Limited, Bangalore Vs. Union of India ...
Karnataka
Jun-30-1997
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 5-A, 11-A(1) and 35-L; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 6; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 13, 43, 49, 52-A, 53, 173-B, 173-C, 173-G, 173-F and 226
1998(98)ELT355(Kar)
Sri G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
ORDER1. In this petition for a writ of certiorari the petitioner-Company calls in question the validity of a notice issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, thereby the petitioner has been asked to show cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEquipment Sales Corporation Vs. Asstt. Collector of Customs
Karnataka
Jun-21-1989
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 45
1990(25)ECC145; 1989(24)LC767(Karnataka); 1989(43)ELT256(Kar); 1989(2)KarLJ242
G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
S.R. Rajasekhara Murthy, J1. In Writ Petition Nos. 3181 and 3101/89 the petitions are by the same petitioner. Writ Petition No. 3102/89 is filed by a different petitioner. 2. The contentions urged in these Writ Petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd ...
Karnataka
Jan-31-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 14, 24, 24(2), 28, 29, 30, 32, 32(2), 32A, 33, 33A, 37(2A), 45, 71, 72, 72(1), (2) and (3), 73, 73A and 256; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2) and 24(2)
[1991]191ITR156(KAR); [1991]191ITR156(Karn)
G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The question referred to us under section 256 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), read thus : '(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. M. Ramachandran
Karnataka
Jan-14-1991
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17(1)
(1991)99CTR(Kar)244; [1991]191ITR186(KAR); [1991]191ITR186(Karn); [1992]62TAXMAN125(Kar)
G. Chandrakumar, Adv.
K. Shivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The following questions have been referred for our opinion under the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »