Advanced Search Results
M/S. Premier Irrigation Equipments Limited, Bangalore Vs. Union of Ind ...
Karnataka
Aug-19-1997
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35-L; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226, 227, 323-A(2) and 323-B(3); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs and Excise Revenues Appellate Tribunal Act, 1986 - Sections 26
1998(59)ECC489; 1998(100)ELT29(Kar); ILR1998KAR1235; 1998(2)KarLJ652
Sri G. Chander Kumar, Senior Counsel and ;Sri Rajesh Chandra Kumar, Adv.
ORDERG.C. Bharuka, J.1. The petitioner is a limited company. It is engaged in the manufacture, sale and marketing of sprinkler irrigation system including pumps and motors which are used in the agricultural fields for irrigational purposes....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Income-tax O ...
Karnataka
Mar-21-1971
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(1), 139(2), 143(3), 147, 148 and 271(4A)
[1972]86ITR566(KAR); [1972]86ITR566(Karn)
G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
Govinda Bhat, J. 1. The Indian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. is the petitioner in this batch of seven writ petitions. They relate to the assessments made on the petitioner under the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Nagamanickam Setty and anr. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bangal ...
Karnataka
Mar-23-1983
Excise
Constitution of India - Article 226; Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 79 and 80(2)
AIR1983Kant193; 1986(23)ELT75(Kar)
G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. Sri N. Nagamanickam Shetty of Mysore, petitioner No. 1 is a dealer in gold in accordance with a licence issued to him by the authority under the Gold Control Act, 1968 (Central Act 45 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mageshwari Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
Karnataka
Nov-04-1992
Direct Taxation
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139(8), 217 and 264
ILR1992KAR3603
G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
K.A. Swami, Ag. C.J. 1. As the Appeals lie in a very narrow compass they are admitted and heard for final disposal. These two Appeals are preferred against the order dated 15th September 1992 passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Venkatesh Nayak Vs. Income-tax Officer and Another
Karnataka
Feb-04-1993
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(40), 139, 139(2) and (8), 142, 143, 143(3), 144, 147, 148, 215, 246, 264, 271(4A), 273 and 276CC
(1993)112CTR(Kar)167; ILR1993KAR1139; [1993]202ITR575(KAR); [1993]202ITR575(Karn); 1993(37)KarLJ310
G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
K.A. Swami, Actg. C.J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated October 12, 1992, passed by the learned single judge in Writ Petition No. 29666 of 1992. The learned single single has rejected the writ...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBahubali Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-17-1983
Customs
(1984)(16)ELT631Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an application for reference under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Tribunal in appeal No. CD.(MAS) 31/82, dated 25-6-1983. A short resume of the facts may be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecision Telecom Products Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise and or ...
Karnataka
Feb-12-1986
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1)
1986(9)ECC25; 1986(24)ELT235(Kar)
D. Prakash Rao, Adv. (By Chander Kumar, Adv.)
ORDER1. M/s. Precision Telecom Products, Bangalore, which is the petitioner before us, is a partnership firm of partners engaged in the manufacture of transmitters and other components for telephones that are ultimately manufactured by the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDoddaballapur Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.
Karnataka
Aug-29-1990
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 12A and 33
1991(31)ECC379; 1992(61)ELT539(Kar); 1990(3)KarLJ431
Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.
ORDERM.P. Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. The petitioner is the Doddabalapur Spinning Mills, Doddaballapur. In this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution it has challenged the competence of respondent 1 to issue the show cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Mageshwari Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Another
Karnataka
Nov-04-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(8), 147, 246 and 264; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
(1993)109CTR(Kar)301; [1993]201ITR472(KAR); [1993]201ITR472(Karn); 1993(37)KarLJ137; [1993]67TAXMAN497(Kar)
G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.
K.A. Swami, Actg. J.1. As the appeals lie in a very narrow compass, they are admitted and heard for final disposal. These two appeals are preferred against the order dated September 15, 1992, passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Agarwal Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Aug-19-1988
Land Acquisition
(1989)(22)LC61Tri(Chennai)
1. These applications arise out of a common order dated 31-8-87, passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, by which he had ordered absolute confiscation of 2,226 gms. of primary gold seized from the possession...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »