Advanced Search Results

M.P.Jewellers Vs. New M.P. Jewellers Chawk Bazaar

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Circuit Bench Sitting at Kolkata) Hon'ble Shri Justice S.Jagadeesan. Chairman: The applicant filed this application under section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) for rectification of the Register...

M/S. Pataka Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Henry MekIn India Pvt. Ltd. and o ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Education

ORDER SHEET GA2519of 2013 With CS51of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.PATAKA INDUSTRIES PVT.LTD.Versus HENRY MEKIN INDIA PVT.LTD.& ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 1st August,...

Motiur Rahman, Sajjad Ali and Vs. Commr. of Customs (P), Patna

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2002)(147)ELT690Tri(Kol.)kata

1. The prayer in all the three application is for dispensing with the condition of predeposit of penalty amount of Rs.30,000/- each imposed on Mohedur Rahman and Sajjad Ali and an amount of Rs.60,000/- on Motiur...

Motiur Rahman and Others Vs. C.C. (Prev.), Patna

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)(78)ECC171

1. All the three appellants are aggrieved with the orders passed by the authorities below vide which silk yarn totally valued at Rs.4,69,800/- has been confiscated absolutely and personal penalties of Rs.60,000/-, Rs.30,000/- have been imposed...

Vijay Prakash Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Customs, West

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2002)(149)ELT115Tri(Kol.)kata

1. After dispensing with the condition of predeposit of penalty of Rs. 3,000/-, I take up the appeal itself with the consent of both the sides.2. The facts of the present case are that on 19.11.96,...

Macotax Consultant Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)133STC67Tribunal

1. The case is taken up for final hearing. Heard arguments by Mr. G.Chakraborty learned Senior Advocate for the applicant and Mr. M.C.Mukhopadhyay learned State Representative.2. This is an application under Section 8 of the West...

Ashim Guhathakurta and ors. Vs. Binoy Kumar Chatterjee and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE CS NO.943 OF1982GA NO.1532 OF2014GA NO.1541 OF2014GA NO.1542 OF2014GA NO.1545 OF2014GA NO.464 OF2014ASHIM GUHATHAKURTA & ORS.Versus BINOY KUMAR CHATTERJEE & ORS.……… GA...

Faqir Singh Vs. District Magistrate and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1989CriLJ2543

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D. C. Raina

ORDERK.K. Gupta, J.1. Faqir Singh petitioner has been detained for a period of 24 months under Section 8 of Public Safety Act, (for short Act hereinafter), vide order No. 54/88 dated November 22, 1988, passed by...

Sushil Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. Director of Entry Taxes and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ConstitutionOther Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; ;Entry of Goods into Calcutta Metropolitan Area Act, 1972 - Section 19; Entry of Goods into Calcutta Metropolitan Area Rules - Rule 25(5)

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT395(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chakraborty, Sr. Adv., ;U. Chakraborty and ;D. Roy Chowdhury, Advs.

Amitava Lala, J.1. By this writ petition 42 writ petitioners are largely affected on account of non-payment of refund. All of them have made a joint writ petition after making an appropriate Court Fees through Smt....

iag Company Ltd. Vs. Triveni Glass Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 1911 - Section 51A and 53; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 19(1), 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3), 48, 48(2) and 48(4)

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN447,2005(30)PTC140(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chakraborty, ;S. Sarkar, ;R. Bachhawat, ;Sayantan Bose and ;S.B. Chakraborty, Advs.

Asok Kumar Ganguly, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 11th February, 2004 passed by the learned Judge of the first Court refusing to grant injunction on its application (G. A. No. 2709 in...