Advanced Search Results
Kamal Kishore Binal Vs. Avinash Nayyar and ors.
Delhi
Dec-19-1985
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 6(1)(A)(2)
29(1986)DLT417
G.C. Mittal and; R.L. Tandon, Advs
G.C. Jain, J.(1) On June 1,1962 Dr. Beli Ram (Since deceased) Jet out the premises in dispute, i.e. 167 Golf Link, Mew Delhi to Smt. Abinash Kaur (Since deceased) on a monthly rent of Rs. 14007-....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHardayal Vs. Surja Ram
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-02-1976
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 41, Rule 5 and 5(3)
AIR1977P& H259
G.C. Mittal, Adv.
ORDERR.S. Narula, C.J.1. In a suit for recovery of Rs. 6,381.95 Paise on account of arrears of rent and interest up to June 10, 1973, and for ejectment, a decree for ejectment and for recovery of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLabh Singh and anr. Vs. Hardayal and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-19-1977
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 47 - Order 20, Rule 14; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1977P& H294
G.C. Mittal, Adv.
B.S. Dhillon, J. 1. Labh Singh appellant filed a suit claiming superior right of pre-emption over the land in dispute. The said suit was decreed by the learned trial Court on May 27, 1971, subject to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Daulat Ram Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-17-1969
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1969P& H396
G.C. Mittal and; Parkash Chand Jain, Advs.
Shamsher Bahadur, J.1. This letters patent Appeal from the order of Pandit Appeal from the order of Pandit , J. was admitted for hearing before a Full Bench on 19th January, 1966. It arises out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Baldev Raj Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-27-1968
Sales Tax
[1969]24STC173(P& H)
G.C. Mittal, Adv.
S.B. Capoor, J.1. This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated the 30th August, 1968, whereby the writ petition of Dr. Baldev Raj, the appellant, was dismissed.2. In that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRudra Talkies and ors. Vs. Prem Sagar and Co. and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-16-1966
Civil
Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 9 and 10; Punjab Cinemas (Regulations) Rules, 1952 - Rule 19(1); Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1967P& H348
H.L. Sibal and; G.C. Mittal, Advs.
Gurdev Singh, J.1. On 30th of October 1968, respondent No. 1, Messrs. Prem Sagar and Company, applied to the District Magistrate, Karnal, the licensing authority under the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952, (Punjab Act No. 11...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbnash Kaur Vs. the Lord Krishna Sugar Mills Ltd., Delhi and ors.
Delhi
May-11-1973
Company
Constitution (Thirtieth Amendment) Act, 1972 - Sections 3(1) and 3(2); Constitution of India - Article 133 and 133(1); Companies Act
9(1973)DLT357
G.C. Mittal,; Ved Vyas and; S.P. Aggarwal, Advs
P.N. Khanna, J (1) This order will dispose of three separate applications, SCAs 266, 267 and 268 of 1972, filed by Smt. Abnash Kaur. herein referred to as 'the petitioner', under Article 133 of the Constitution...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chander Garg Vs. State of Punjab, Through the Secretary Health ...
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-21-1966
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 15(4) and 226
AIR1966P& H476
G.C. Mittal,; Trilok Nath Datta and; K.S. Saini, Adv
R.S. Narula, J.1. The relevant facts of this case are given in substantial detail in my order of reference, dated August 13, 1965 which may be read as a part of this judgment.2. At the hearing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanker Dass Bishan Dass and ors. Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Jullundur C ...
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-07-1968
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
AIR1968P& H521
G.C. Mittal and; M.C. Sud, Advs.
ORDERR.S. Sarkaria, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing the orders, dated October 28, 1967 (Annexure 'B') of the Deputy Commissioner, Jullundur (Respondent 1), whereby he fixed the prices of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.R. Balasubramanian Vs. Shriram Scientific and Industrial Research
Delhi
Apr-28-2006
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 14(1), 22 and 39; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 12 - Rule 8 - Order 29; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(7)
129(2006)DLT763
Sudhanshu Batra and; Vhuvan Gugnani, Advs
Sanjiv Khanna, J.1. The appellant, Mr. T.R. Balasubramanian, has filed the present second appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958(hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and order dated 6th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »