Advanced Search Results
Darshani Devi and ors. Vs. Sheo Ram and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-11-1986
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95
[1989]65CompCas353(Raj); 1987(1)WLN332
G.C. Mathur, Adv.; S.C. Srivastava and; H.M. Bhargava
G.M. Lodha, J.1. These nine appeals, bearing Nos. 226 of 1984, 230 of 1984, 228 of 1984, 215 of 1984, 141 of 1985, 42 of 1985, 139 of 1985, 140 of 1985 and 138 of 1985,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamla and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corpn.
Rajasthan
Aug-08-1991
Motor Vehicles
1993ACJ958
G.C. Mathur, Adv.
D.L. Mehta and N.C. Kochhar, JJ.1. On 9.11.1989, Harinarain, who was the husband of the appellant No. 1 and father of appellant Nos. 2 to 4, while going on a motor cycle met with an accident...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Vs. Chotu and ors.
Rajasthan
Nov-25-1987
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(1989)ACC479
Mr. G.C. Mathur
I.S. Israni, J.1. This is a Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the award dated July 30, 1984 passed by the Motor Accidents claims...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shrwan Kumar Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and ors.
Rajasthan
May-23-1994
Motor Vehicles
1995ACJ337
G.C. Mathur and; S.C. Srivastava, Advs.
R.S. Verma, J.1. All these three appeals (Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 158 and 159 of 1986 filed by Shrwan Kumar and 4 of 1987 filed by Manni Devi) are directed against a common award dated 22.5.1986,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Bombay Vs. Parshottam Kanaiyalal
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-1960
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 7, 16, 20 and 20(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 197
AIR1961SC1; (1961)63BOMLR265; (1961)63PLR439; [1961]1SCR458
Ayyangar, J.1. This appeal by special leave of this Court raises a very short point regarding the construction of s. 20(1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (37 of 1954). 2. The respondent owned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVaish College (Society) Shamli and ors. Vs. Sri Lakshmi NaraIn and ors ...
Allahabad
Aug-24-1973
ServiceConstitution
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Kanpur and Meerut Universities Act, 1965 - Sections 30, 31, 38 and 50(1); Agra University Act, 1926 - Sections 25C, 25C(1), 25C(2), 28(3) and 29A; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920 - Sections 31; Aligarh Muslim University Regulations - Regulations 3 and 10
AIR1974All1b
P.C. Gupta and ;N.P. Singh, Advs.
Asthana, J.1. The basic question, common to all these cases referred to a Full Bench, is whether the relationship between the parties was that of pure master and servant unregulated or uncontrolled by any statutory provision...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Bahadur Bhandari Vs. Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Bo ...
Rajasthan
Dec-16-1993
Service
1993(3)WLC125; 1993WLN(UC)481
K.C. Agrawal, J.1. The only point in the present appeal is in respect of interpretation of entry of Schedule VI 'Ministerial' in the Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board (Service) Bye-Laws, 1977. The entry No. 8 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Jugal Kishore and ors.
Rajasthan
Jan-22-1991
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(1991)ACC66
K.C. Agrawal, C.J.1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur has preferred this appeal against the judgment and award of the Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunal dated 13.3.1989. The award passed was thus:The appellant will get Rs. 1,91,000...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Great Insurance Company of India Ltd. Vs. Koshalesh Sharma and ors ...
Rajasthan
May-03-1989
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
II(1991)ACC684
Shri. G.K. Bhartiya
I.S. Israni, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the Insurance Company against the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gangapur City, in case No. 31/1972. For the purposes of this appeal, it will...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJamuna Dass Vs. Board of Revenue and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-13-1973
FamilyProperty
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 2; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 174 and 175; Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 25 and 27
AIR1973All397
V.K.S. Chaudhary, Adv.
G.C. Mathur, J. 1. The relationship between the parties appears from the following pedigree table: TULSI | _______________________________________________________________________________________________ | | | | | Nathu Ram Tega Lal Budha Smt. Sita Smt. Kamla | Jamuna = Smt....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »