Advanced Search Results
Madanlal Sethi and Others Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Supreme Court of India
Mar-27-1997
EnvironmentConstitution
Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961 - Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 14 and 19(1)
AIR1997SC2264; JT1997(4)SC629; 1997(3)SCALE575; (1997)5SCC141; [1997]3SCR404
D.D Thakur,; G.C. Gupta,; Prakash Shrivastava,;
K. Ramaswamy and G.B. Pattananik1. Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 2184/93. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Nathpa Jhakri Joint Venture
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-07-2006
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 7, 34, 34(1), 35 and 36; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 2
2006(2)ShimLC369
G.C. Gupta and; Sanjay Karol, Sr. Advs. and; Mohinder Ga
Deepak Gupta, J.1. The plaintiff Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited is a joint venture of the Government of India and Government of Himachal Pradesh formerly known as Nathpa Jhakri Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDaladdi Cooperative Agril. Service Society Ltd. Vs. Shri Gurcharan Sin ...
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-28-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12B and 17B
(1994)106PLR174
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Is a workman whose rainstatement has been stayed during the pendency of the proceedings of the High Court entitled to the payment of wages at the same rate as the other workmen...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Surinder Singh Vs. State of H.P. and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-10-2006
Property
Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 12(2), 24, 24(1), 24(2), 27, 33 and 36; ;Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act - Section 14; ;Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; ;Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rules 92, 92(4), 103 and 104
2006(2)ShimLC237
G.C. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Mohinder Gautam, Adv.
K.C. Sood, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of these two petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India as both the petitions arise out of a common order of the Financial Commissioner-cum-Secretary (Relief and Rehabilitation)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldev Raj Vs. Rishi Kumar
Himachal Pradesh
Dec-11-1998
Motor Vehicles
2000ACJ68
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
D. Raju, C.J.1. The above revision petition has been filed against the order of learned District Judge (Forests), Shimla, in Execution Petition No. 1/S/10 of 1998 wherein the learned Judge in the court below chose to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Insurance Co. Vs. Asha Devi (Smt.) and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Sep-26-1996
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2 and 4A
(1999)IIILLJ289HP
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. This appeal at the instance of Insurance Company is directed against the Award passed by Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Rampur, hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner, in case No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Maheshwari and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
May-26-1997
Motor Vehicles
I(1998)ACC622,1998ACJ1268
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
Arun Kumar Goel, J.1. We propose to take and dispose of these three appeals together as they have arisen out of the same accident but from two separate awards passed by Mr. Surjit Singh, Motor Accidents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Dhalu Devi and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
May-07-1996
Motor Vehicles
II(1998)ACC433,1998ACJ210
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
Kamlesh Sharma, J.1. These appeals (F.A.O. Nos. 7 and 10 of 1991) have been filed at the instance of Oriental Insurance Co. against the award dated 22.8.1990 whereby two claim petitions (Claim Petition Nos. 3 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmala Devi Vs. Ved Prakash
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-03-1992
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 125; ;Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9, 13, 23(1) and 28
AIR1993HP1,II(1992)DMC155
G.C. Gupta, Adv.
Devinder Gupta, J. 1. The present appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is against the judgment and decree passed on August 17, 1988, by District Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSanjay Narang Vs. Dit
Mumbai
Sep-10-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)89TTJ(Mumbai)19
Prakash Jotwani, for the Appellant D.R. Sindhal, for the Respondent
ORDERG.C. Gupta, J.M.:These two appeals by the assessee for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99 are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). Since identical issue is involved in these appeals, these are being disposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »