Advanced Search Results

Kuver Bank Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 38 - Order 21, Rules 46 and 49 - Order 30, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1960Cal81,63CWN21

Advocate for Appellant : R. Chaudhuri, Adv.

ORDERH.K. Bose, J.1. This is an application for an order directing the Court Liquidator and certain other parties to pay certain sums of money which are lying in their hands, for appropriating the said sums towards...

Mrs. A.K. Augustine Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Calcutta University First Ordinances, 1979 - Ordinance 35 and 35(2)

Reported in : (1992)2CALLT308(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Palit, ;S.N. Ghatak and ;C.R. Panda, Advs.

Haridas Das, J.1. The petitioner Mrs. A. K. Augustine has in this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayed for issue of a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto commanding the respondent...

Chandika Sarma Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Advocate for Appellant : C.R. De and S. Chauhan, Advs.

R.S. Mongia, C.J. 1. The petitioner was tried in FIR No. 66/90 of Dhubri Police Station, district Dhubri dated 17.2.1990 under Sections 143/458, etc. but was acquitted on 5.12.1992 (CR Case No. 200/90). However no order...

In Re: Ocl India Ltd.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 101, 102 and 103

Reported in : AIR1998Ori153; [1999]95CompCas429(Orissa)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Ahmed, Adv.;A.K. Parija, ;S.P. Sarangi, ;B. Ch. Mohanty, ;P.P. Mohanty, ;Pitambar Acharya, ;A.C. Samantray and ;A. Pattanaik, Advs.;D.K. Mohapatra, ;P.C. Sahu, ;J.N. Sahu, ;S.C. Ghose and ;S. Ghos

Pasayat, J. 1. In this application purported to be under Sections 78, 100, 101,102 and 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short, the 'Act') M/s. OCL India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the 'Company/Petitioner') has...

Azgor Ali and ors. Vs. ReazuddIn Miah and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 8, Rule 3

Advocate for Appellant : T.C. Majumdar, A.K. Bhattacharyya, G. Ahmed and A.K. Das, Advs.

S.N. Phukan, J. 1. This Second Appeal is direeted against the judgment and decree dt. 14-7-1978 passed by the learned Assistant District Judge, Goalpara, Dhubri in Title Appeal No. 15 of 1978. By the impugned judgment...

Fathima Automobiles Vs. P.K.P. Nair and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 18, 18(2) and 23(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 97 and 101

Reported in : AIR1985Mad318

Advocate for Appellant : A. Ramanathan, Adv. for ;K.G. Ahmed, Adv.

Ramanujam, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of Mohan, J. in W. P. 7351 of 1981, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant on the ground that the appellant has got a...

The Union of India Through the General Manager, Central Railway, Bomba ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 31

Reported in : AIR1971Bom172

Advocate for Appellant : K.V. Tambey, Adv.

1. The applicant Union of India through the General Manager Central Railway, Bombay, has come here in revision from the decree passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Akola, decreeing the claim of the plaintiff against the...

The Sattenapalli Panchayat Board Vs. Yekkala Lakshmi Kantam and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Schedule - Article 17-B; Andhra Pradesh Village Panchayats Act, 1950 - Sections 64(1); Andhra Pradesh Buildings ( Lease, Rent and Eviction ) Control Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1973AP156

Advocate for Appellant : P. Surayanarayanamurthy, Adv. for ;P. Sivasankar, Adv.

1. 5 rate payers of Sattenapalli Gram Panchayat have filed a suit in a representative capacity on behalf of all the rate payers of the said panchayat questioning the revision of house taxes in the Panchayat...

Dominion of India Vs. AmIn Chand Bhola Nath

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1957P& H49

Advocate for Appellant : Nand Lal Salooja and; Pratap Singh, Advs.

Bishan Narain, J. 1. The following question has been referred to the Full Bench :--'Prom what time does the limitation start in a case in which the carrier delivers only part of the consigned goods and...

Bootamal Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 18, 31, 78 and 131; Limitation Act, 1877; Displaced Persons (Institution of Suits) Act, 1948 - Sections 8; Displaced Persons (Institution of suits and legal proceedings) Amendment Act, 1950; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1962SC1716; 1962(0)BLJR832; [1963]1SCR70

Wanchoo, J.1. This appeal on a certificate granted by the Punjab High Court raises a question as to the interpretation of Art. 31 of the Limitation Act. The appellant had brought a suit in forma pauperis...