Advanced Search Results

Satya Vir Singh Vs. the Delhi Transport Corporation Through Its Chairm ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Amit Kumar Pandey for S.C. Chaturvedi, Advocates. For the Respondents: S.K. Bansal for Manish Garg, Advocates.

Shri A.K. Bhardwaj: 1. Applicant, who is working with Delhi Transport Corporation as Driver since 1980, has filed present Original Application seeking issuance of direction against respondents for removing anomalous situation in the basic pay drawn...

Ram Dev, Ex-constable Vs. Delhi Police Through the Commissioner of Pol ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: Amit Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mrs. Sumedha Sharma, Advocate.

By Hon’ble Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J) 1. Applicant has challenged order dated 4.9.2009 whereby he was dismissed from service (page 18) and order dated 6.4.2010 whereby his appeal was rejected (page 15). 2. The brief...

Ashok Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. Mohan Singh and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

P.K. Deb, J. 1. All these appeals have been heard analogously as they arise out of the common judgment and award passed by the 2nd Additional District Judge-cum-Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Muzaffarpur in Claim Case Nos....

Amit Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Nishant Datt

Cr.R.No.2313/2012 22.3.2013 Shri Manish Datt, Senior Advocate with Shri Nishant Datt, counsel for the applicant. Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. As prayed by learned counsel for the parties, heard them finally. The applicant...

Pawan Sandhu and Another Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Crl.M.not M-13521 of 2013 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.M.not M-13521 of 2013 (O&M) Date of decision :29. 7.2013 ..Pawan Sandhu and another ................Petitioners versus State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram:...