Advanced Search Results
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Fazal HusaIn Rajabali Bohra
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-16-1967
Criminal
Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(3) and 141; Essential Articles (Price Control) Order, 1963
AIR1968MP138; 1968CriLJ946
H.L. Khaskalam, Government Adv.
Pandey, J. 1. The respondent Fazal Hussain was convicted by Magistrate First Class, Khandwa, under Rule 125(9)(a) of the Defence of India Rules, 1962 (hereinafter called the Rules) for failing to exhibit, as required by Clause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKaushalkumar and ors. Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Nov-13-1992
Criminal
Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1956 - Sections 302, 303, 304, 305, 307, 307(5), 308 and 400(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2; Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporations Rules
1993(0)MPLJ228
M.G. Upadhyay, Adv.
ORDERV.S. Kokje, J. 1. This is a revision application challenging the order dated 9th July, 1990 passed by the Xth Addl. Judge to the Court of District Judge, Indore in M. J. C. No. 19 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChunni Lal Vs. Smt. Shanti Devi and anr.
Rajasthan
Apr-08-1999
Civil
1999(3)WLC307; 1999(1)WLN328
R.R. Yadav, J.1.Heard.2. Perused the order impugned dated 30.1.1999 passed by the learned trial court rejecting the application moved by the defendant-revisionist under Sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of Order 13 CPC.3. Without delineating the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
S.A.A. Annamalai Chettiar Vs. Molaiyan and ors.
Chennai
Apr-10-1969
Tenancy
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 23
AIR1970Mad396; (1970)2MLJ562
K. Gopalachari, Adv.
ORDERGanesan, J.1. Annamalai Chettiar, the plaintiff in Small Cause Suits Nos. 274, 275 and 276 of 1967 is the revision petitioner and he is aggrieved that the District Munslf of Pudukottai had dismissed all the three...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSadbuddhi Brahmesh Wagh and ors. Vs. Satish Raghvendra Wagh and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-28-2003
Arbitration
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 24
2004(2)ALLMR416; 2004(3)BomCR98; 2004(1)MhLj890
Virendra Tulzapurkar and ;Salil Shah, Advs. i/b ;B. Amin Co.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16th October 1997 whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the arbitration petition filed by the appellants herein under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPathivada Narayanswamy Vs. Gaulocha Pannalal and Kenguva Appalanarasai ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-27-1998
CivilContract
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47 and 73
1998(3)ALD80; 1998(2)ALT718
Mr. D. Ramalingaswamy, Adv.
1. This second appeal is preferred against the decree and judgment in A.S. No-7/1996 on the file of the District Court, Vizianagaram. 2. The 1st respondent-plaintiff filed a suit O.S.No.249/1988 on the file of the Principal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.Y. Maharshi and anr. Vs. District Collector and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-05-2009
Property
Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 - Sections 9; Constitution of India - Article 226
2009(6)ALT224
P. Venugopal, Adv.
B. Prakash Rao, J.1. The appellants herein are the unsuccessful petitioners, who sought to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the orders of the learned Single Judge in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFazal HussaIn and ors. Vs. Kalu Khan and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-03-1989
Civil
II(1989)ACC391; 1990ACJ84
G.M. Bhandari, Adv.
A.K. Mathur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 5.12.1984 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Jodhpur.2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that an accident took place...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Chhajjoomal and Sons and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
May-07-2002
ArbitrationLimitation
Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20, 29, 30, 33 and 39
2002(5)MPHT354
B.G. Neema, Sr. Standing Counsel
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. We are deciding these Misc. Appeals which have been preferred by both the parties under Section 39(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29th March, 1985...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYeradevireddi Venkataramanappa and anr. Vs. Nallapareddi Subbamma and ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jun-20-2007
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47 and 73
2007(6)ALD32
M. Dilip Rao, Adv.
P.S. Narayana, J.1. This Court on 11.11.2005 made the following order:In view of the substantial question of law 'as to whether on the facts and circumstances the Court below was right in exercising comparison of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »