Advanced Search Results
ipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Gajanand Meena, Deputy Cit and ors. (No. 2)
Mumbai
Jul-02-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)170CTR(Bom)582; [2001]251ITR416(Bom)
Y.P. Trivedi, Senior Advocate, with (F.V Irani & A.K. Jasani), for the Assessee R.V. Desai, Senior Advocate, with P.S. Jetley and J.P. Deodhar, instructed by H.D. Rathod, for the Reven
S.H. Kapadia J.Both the above writ petitions involve the same question of law. Both the petitions involve the same parties. Hence, they are heard together.By the above two writ petitions, the petitioner which is an Export...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtlas Copco (India) Ltd. Vs. V.S. Samuel, Assistant Commissioner of In ...
Mumbai
Mar-07-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 36(1), 80HHC, 124(3), 142(2A) and 143(2); Companies Act
(2006)202CTR(Bom)361; [2006]283ITR56(Bom)
F.V. Irani, Adv., i/b., A.K. Jasani, Adv.
R.M. Lodha, J.1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to the order passed by this Court in Writ Petn. No. 1314 of 2004, Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT 6(3),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN730(Bom)
R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue F. V. Irani and A.K. Jasani, for the Assessee
S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 20-8-2001 passed by the Tribunal in Income Tax Appeal No. 9987/Bom./92 for assessment year 1989-90, the department has come by way of appeal under section 260A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN422(Bom)
F.V. Irani and A.K. Jasani, for the Assessee R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal dated 20-8-2001 in ITA No. 9987/Bom/92 in respect of assessment year 1989-90, the assessee has come by way of appeal under section 260A of the Income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmerican Bureau of Shipping Vs. Cit
Mumbai
Jul-24-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]132TAXMAN93(Bom)
F.V. Irani, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.At the instance of the assessee, two Questions of Law have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act concerning assessment year 1977-78 :'1. Whether the Tribunal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of Baroda Vs. H.C. Shrivatsava
Mumbai
Jul-30-2001
Direct Taxation
[2002]122TAXMAN330(Bom)
F.V. Irani and J.N. Shah, for the Revenue R.V. Desai, J.P. Deodhar and P.S. Jetly, for the Assessee
V.C. Daga, J.Having heard the parties at length, this petition was allowed for the reasons to be recorded subsequently. We, accordingly, give our reasons for allowing the petition.This petition is directed against the revisional order dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bharatkumar Modi
Mumbai
Sep-08-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]113TAXMAN386(Bom)
R.V. Desai, J. P. Deodhar and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue S. E. Dastur, F.V. Irani and Rajesh Shah, for the Assessee
Kapadia, J. Since the above appeals raise common question of law and fact, they are disposed of together by this common judgment.2. The short question which arises for determination in this appeal is as follows :'Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askipca Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai
Dec-29-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)70TTJ(Mumbai)991
S.E. Dastoor, F.V. Irani & P.N. Vepan, for the Appellant Sudeer Chandra & H. Snnivasulu, for the Respondent
ORDERJaidev, AM.This is the appeal filed by the assessee against order of Commissioner (Appeals) dated 11-10-1999. The first grievance of the assessee-company is that Commissioner (Appeals) has erred in confirming the order of assessing officer and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManeklal D. Shah Vs. P.K. Gupta
Mumbai
Feb-08-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN469(Bom)
F.V. Irani and L. M. Shah, for the Petitioner R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Respondent
ORDERV.C. Daga, J.This petition is directed against the order dated 4-9-1986 (Exhibit-E) passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II, Mumbai under section 273A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Lever Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Apr-30-1998
Direct Taxation
(1999)68ITD85(Mum.)
1. This appeal by the assessee for the asst. yr. 1989-90 is directed against the order of the CIT(A) upholding rectification carried by the AO under s. 154 of the IT Act withdrawing deduction of additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »