Advanced Search Results
Abdul Hakim Son of. Abdul Rahim Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Apr-18-2012
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988 - Sections 13(1)(e), 13(2), 2(c)(12); Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) 1973 - Section 482
Mr. F.T.Mirza, Adv.
1. By this application, the applicants have prayed for quashing of F.I.R. No.3009 of 2011, dt.8.11.2011 reported to Police Station, Aheri, District Gadchiroli u/s.13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 r/w. Section 109...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Ramlal Jaiswal and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai Nagpur
Aug-11-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 156 (3), 173 (8), 397(2), 482, 202(1) ; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 120-B rw 420, 467, 468, 471; Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138
Mr. F.T.Mirza, Adv.
Top of Form 1. Heard Mr. F.T.Mirza, Adv. for the Applicant, Mr.M.K.Pathan, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1/State and Mr.S.V.Sirpurkar, Adv. for Respondent no.2. 2. The applicants, by this application, have questioned the order dated 17.09.2010 passed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGajanan Bhaurao Waghmare and Madhukar Fakiraji Sute Vs. State of Mahar ...
Mumbai
Apr-02-2008
Civil
Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 9(1), 11, 11(1), 15, 21 and 321; Maharashtra Municipal Council and Nagar Panchayats (Qualifications and Appointments of Nominated Councilors) Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 5
2008(4)ALLMR349; 2008(3)MhLj225
A.S. Chandurkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 14 of 2007, ;F.T. Mirza, Adv. in W.P. No. 35 of 2007, ;A.A. Naik, Adv. in W.P. No. 234 of 2007, ;C.S. Kaptan, Adv. in W.P. No. 395/2007 and ;S.V. Bhutada, Adv. in W.P
R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule in W.P. No. 234/2007. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally at this stage with the group of connected petitions.2. By these petitions, the petitioners question the validity of amended Rules 3 and 5 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
MohioddIn and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
Jan-29-2013
Criminal
Oral Judgment: (A.P. Lavande, J.) Heard learned Adv. Mr. F.T. Mirza for the applicants and learned APP Mr. M.K. Pathan, who waives notice on behalf of respondent. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukesh and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Hom ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Aug-14-2014
Land Acquisition
Shri. S. Joshi
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Basic challenge in all these Petitions is to raid on or stoppage of vehicles transporting liquor by police personal functioning under Bombay Police Act (hereinafter referred to as âthe Police Actâ for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishor and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another
Mumbai Nagpur
Jun-26-2015
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment [Per Court]: 1. Jawaharlal Darda Education Society, Yavatmal, is a registered Society/Public Trust running educational institutions. Shri Kishor Sureshchandra Darda is the Secretary of the said society. Shri Prakash Dhanraj Chopda is the President...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSopan and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Mumbai Nagpur
Aug-09-2016
Land Acquisition
Mr. F. T. Mirza
V.M. Deshpande, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. The facts giving rise to the present application are summarized as under: (a) The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Ramlal Jaiswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Aug-11-2011
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 156 (3), 173 (8), 397(2), 482, 202(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471,; Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138
JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Mr. F.T.Mirza, Adv. for the Applicant, Mr.M.K.Pathan, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1/State and Mr.S.V.Sirpurkar, Adv. for Respondent no.2. 2. The applicants, by this application, have questioned the order dated 17.09.2010 passed under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Kasana Chavhan Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai Nagpur
Oct-25-2012
Criminal
A.P. Bhangale, J. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dt.18.1.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Sessions Trial No.13 of 2000 whereby the appellants were found guilty of the offence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak S/O Dayaram Pendam Vs. Nagpur Municipal Corporation and anr.
Mumbai
Jul-10-2007
Election
City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 9AA
2008(1)MhLj617
F.T. Mirza, Adv.
A.H. Joshi, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable, and the petition is heard.Petitioner's claim proceeds on a very simplified logic. According to the petitioner:(a) The petitioner and Shri Deorao Umredkar were the only candidates in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »