Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: f rebello · Page 1 of about 41 results (0.027 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 1994

Domingos Estevam V. Monteiro Vs. Comunidade of Santo Estevam and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-04-1994

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 - Sections 14(1)(b), 14(3) and 58, ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : 1995(1)BomCR580

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

E.S. Da Silva, J1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution raises an interesting question as to who, under Article 14 of the Agricultural Tenancy Act, inherits the tenancy.2. The petitioner claims...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1986

Halima Shaik Yacub (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Srinivassa N. Pai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-17-1986

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 - Sections 22; Goa Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1969 - Rule 12; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR320

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello and ;J.C. Da Costs, Advs.

G.F. Couto, J.1. Petitioners challenge by way of this writ petition, the orders dated 24th April, 1985, passed by the Rent Controller and the order dated 24th January, 1986, dismissing the application for condonation of delay,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1988

Chandrakant Jagannath Manjrekar and anr. Vs. Shripad Vaikunth Naik

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1988

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 114 - Order 39, Rule 6 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1989Bom91

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

ORDER1. Judgment dated August 24, 1987 is sought to be reviewed by the applicants who are petitioners in the revision application No. 56/87. By the impugned judgment while confirming that the respondent/original plaintiff has made out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 04 2014

Chandrakant Pednekar and Another Vs. Pradeep D. Chodnekar and Another

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. Narvekar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Ramani, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable and heard forthwith....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1988

Caetanoe Lourence and ors. Vs. Additional Dy. Collector (Land Acquisit ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1) and 6(2)

Reported in : 1988(4)BomCR498

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

G.F. Couto, J. 1. By a Notification dated 18th February, 1982, the appropriate Government notified under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') that the land described in its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1983

Chunilal Ishwarlal Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-22-1983

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1984(1)BomCR115

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

R.A. Jahagirdar, J.1. The appellant before us had preferred a writ petition, being Special Civil Application No. 144 of 1981 in the Court of the Judicial Commissioner. The learned Judicial Commissioner, by his judgment and order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1995

The Goa Judicial Officers' Association Vs. the State of Goa and Ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-1995

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Civil Services (Judicial) Rules, 1992 - Rule 17 and 18; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 233, 234, 235, 309, 320 and 320(3); Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987 - Sections 60(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1 - Rules 17 and 18

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR372

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

T.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith.2. The petitioner is an association of Judicial Officers working in the subordinate courts in Goa. In this writ petition the petitioner challenges the validity...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1994

Village Panchayat of Collem Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Government of Goa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-19-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(J)

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR249]; (1996)ILLJ126Bom

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello, Adv.

E.S. Da Silva, J.1. By this order, I propose to dispose of this writ petition which challenges the award dated March 3, 1988, of the Industrial Tribunal in Reference No. IT/24/86, whereby it was held that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 1988

Shobha Suryavanshi Shivappa (Kum.) Through Her Guardian Vs. State of G ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-21-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 341; Goa, Daman and Diu Reorganisation Act, 1987; Constitution (Scheduled Caste) Order, 1950

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR720

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello and ; G.D. Kirtani, Advs.

G.D. Kamat, J.1. This petition raises a short point but somewhat of importance in the academic field in the matter of reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes. Kum. Shobha Suryavanshi Shivappa, a student, minor in age...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 1991

Vishvanath Putu Chipkar and ors. Vs. Mormugao Port Trust by Its Chairm ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-13-1991

Subject : Service

Acts : Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 28 and 126; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 335, 341 and 342; Mormugao Port Employees (Recruitment, Seniority and Promotion) Regulations, 1964

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR39; (1991)93BOMLR220

Advocate for Appellant : F. Rebello and ;G.D. Kirtani, Advs.

G.D. Kamat, J.1. The petitioners and respondents Nos. 3 to 6 are the employees of Mormugao Port Trust, the first respondent. Mormugao Port is a Major Port under the Major Port Trust Act, 1963. Under section...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial