Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: f devitre and · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.026 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 17 2009

Sigtia Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-17-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 - Sections 4; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labor Practices Act - Sections 44 and 45; Right to Information Act (RTI)

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR414

Advocate for Appellant : Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Adv. and ;Himanshu Kode, Adv., i/b., Shaunak Satpute & Co. in Writ Petition No. 1036 of 2007, ;F. Devitre, Sr. Adv. and ;H.N. Thakore, Adv., i/b., Thakore Jariwala and Associates

R.G. Ketkar, J.1. All these petitions challenge the order dated February 6, 2007 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority (for short 'SRA'). The controversy in all these petitions relates to the grant of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2014

SBICAP Trustee Company Limited and Others Vs. United Spirits Limited a ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Decided on : Jul-18-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Mr. F. Devitre, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, Mr. S. Malyekar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1991

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Patel Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Decided on : Mar-27-1991

Subject : MRTP

1. This matter arises out of 98 references filed under Section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the applicant-company") for confirming the opinion formed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 2004

Rhodia Limited, Vs. Neon Laboratories Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : ContractCompany

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9A, 11, 20 and 20C - Order 6, Rule 2 - Order 18, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Article 227; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 57(1), 101 and 102; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : 2005(1)ALLMR703

Advocate for Appellant : F. Devitre, Senior Counsel and ;Ruby Kerawala, Advs., i/b., Little & Co.

V.C. Daga, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of parties.Heard rival parties. Perused petition, affidavits and counter affidavits.2. This petition takes exception to the order dated 7th February, 2004 passed below Exh.58 by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2001

Renuka Datla Vs. Duphar Interfran Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-24-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 391(1), 392, 392(1), 393, 393(1) and 394; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19AA)

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR387; [2004]121CompCas631(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : F. Devitre and ;Shyam Mehta, Advs.;C.J. Joy, Adv. ;Venkatesh Dhond, Adv.

Srikrishna, J.1. Admit. Notice made returnable forthwith. Dr. Tulzapurkar, the learned Counsel, waives service for the respondent. By consent. Appeal Called out and heard.2. This Appeal is directed against the order of the learned Company Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1989

Oil and Natural Gas Commission of India Vs. the Western Company of Nor ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-1989

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11(2), 13, 17, 29, 30 and 136; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Indian Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136; English Arbitration Act, 1950 - Sections 21; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3(1) and 15 to 17

Reported in : AIR1990Bom276; 1989(2)BomCR332

Advocate for Appellant : B. Dutta, Addl. Solicitor General of India,;D.R. Zaiwalla, Sr. Adv.;R.K. Joshi and;F. Devitre, Advs. i/b.;R.K. Mehta and;D. Wadia of Little & Co.

ORDERSavant, J.36. We may now turn to the grounds of attack against the Award. The Award is assailed on two grounds, namely, the misconduct of the Arbitrators and the Umpire and the errors of law apparent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 1997

Shri Qucxova Sinal Cundo, Through His Power of Attorney Shri Naraina S ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-1997

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Goa, Daman and Diu Mining Concessions (Abolition and Declaration as Mining Leases) Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 15, 19 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 39, 31-C, 129, 141, 240, 300-A and 368; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 8, 9-A and 16; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Goa, Daman and Diu (Administration) Act, 1962 - Sections 8; Bombay Land Revenue Code; Land Tenure Abolition Laws (Gujarat Amendment) Act, 1982; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30; Indian Electricity (Assam Amendment) Ordinance, 1972; Tinsukhia and Dibrugarh Electricity Supply Undertakings (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1972

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR87

Advocate for Appellant : B.R. Zailwalla, S.A., ;F. Devitre, ;V.P. Thali, ;Aspi Chinoy,; Milind Sathe,; A.N.S. Nadkarni, ;H.N. Secrvai, ;Anil Wani, ;Kum. Triveni Potekar, ;Kum. Susan Libhares, ;S.D. Lotlikar, ;A.F. Diniz,; F.

ORDERS.N. Variava, J.1. All these petitions can be disposed off by this common judgment. Facts are by and large common. On behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Zaiwalla and Mr. Chinoy have argued. All the other Advocates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2009

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and Amitabha Sengupta Vs. State o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-09-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Companies Act; Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1976 - Sections 7, 20, 37(1), 49, 128 and 150(1); Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966; Land Acquisition Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; D.C. Regulations

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR616; 2009(111)BomLR2243

Advocate for Appellant : F. Devitre and ;N.H. Seervai, Sr. Adv., ;Phiroz Palkhiwala, ;F. Dubash, ;T.K. Majumdar and ;A.C. Sarkate, Advs., i/b., S.R. Page, Adv.

D.K. Deshmukh, J.1. The Petitioners by this petition take exception to the designation of the land which is the subject matter of this petition for the purpose of rehabilitation of slum dwellers and foot path dwellers...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2006

Dr. Anil Nandkishor Tibrewala and anr. Vs. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Banking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19(25), 20, 22, 26(1), 29, 30, 34 and 47; Income Tax Act, 1961; Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993 - Rule 5A and 5A(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 22(2) - Order 21, Rules 58, 58(1), 58(2), 90, 99 and 101 - Order 38, Rules 4 and 11 - Order 41, Rule 27 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 47, Rule 1; Income Tax (Certificate Proceedings) Rules, 1962; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : I(2007)BC6; 2007(3)BomCR941; [2006]133CompCas645(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Iqbal Chagla and ;F. Devitre, Advs.; J.P. Sen, Adv., i/b., Federal and Rashmikant

F.I. Rebello, J.1. Rule. Other respondents, though served, have not put in appearance. Heard forthwith.2. The petitioners had moved the Debts Recovery Tribunal under the provisions of Section 19(25) of the Recovery of Debts Due to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2008

Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companie ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-10-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : M.R.T.P. Act, 1966 - Sections 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10(2); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR642; 2009(1)MhLj638

Advocate for Appellant : F. Devitre, Sr. Counsel and ;Chirag Bowara, Adv., i/b., Chitnis Vaithy & Co.

Anoop v. Mohta, J.1. By consent, heard finally.2. The Petitioners- Original Plaintiffs have challenged the order dated 12th September, 2008 passed by the City Civil Court of Bombay, Dindoshi Branch, Mumbai in Chamber Summons No. 347...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial