Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ex parte · Page 1 of about 48,997 results (1.179 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 2008

Shakuntaladevi and ors. Vs. Shivpuri Sahkari Bhumi Vikas Bank Maryadit ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT123

P.K. Jaiswal, J.1. This second appeal is filed by the plaintiffs/appellants against the judgment and decree dated 1-9-1999 passed by the First Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Shivpuri in Civil Appeal No. 15-A/97,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2000

Sri Krishna Chit Funds (Sattur Private Limited), Satur Having Its Offi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-28-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Sections 64, 151 -- Order 21, Rules 54 and 58-A -- Order 38, Rules 5, 7 and 11-B; Indian Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 114

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC524; (2000)IIMLJ441

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Peppin Fernando, Adv.

ORDER1. Aggreived by the orders in E.A.No.38 of 1999 in E.P.No.87 of 1999 in O.S.No.18 of 1997 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Sivakasi, which was confirmed by the Principal District Judge, Srivilliputhur in C.M.A.No.34 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2002

Bachanu Ram Vs. District Judge, Mirzapur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : 2002(3)AWC2003

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Singh and ;V.K. Singh, Advs.

Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Since these two writ petitions raise common question of fact and law, therefore, are being heard together and disposed of by common judgment. 2. This writ petition challenges the order dated 26.4.1999,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 20 2005

Nilachal Service Station Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jun-20-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10, 12, 17, 17A, 29 and 33C(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(II)OLR565

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Mishra, ;S.K. Mishra, ;S.S. Mishra, ;D. Mishra and ;S.N. Dwivedy, Advs.

A.S. Naidu, J. 1. An Industrial Dispute was raised by opposite party No.2-workman with regard to the propriety or otherwise of termination of his service by the Management of . Nilachal Service Station, the petitioner, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2005

Fancy Agriculture Works Vs. Sunil Kumar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-04-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2006)142PLR582

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Kumar Jindal, Adv.

S.S. Saron, J. 1. This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner M/s Fancy Agriculture Works assailing the order dated 12.8.2005 (Annexure-P.2) passed by the learned Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1963

Arjun Singh Vs. Mohindra Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-13-1963

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rules 1, 6, 6(1), 7, 9 and 13 - Order 11, Rule 7 - Order 17, Rules 2 and 3 - Order 20, Rule 1 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1964SC993; [1964]5SCR946

Ayyangar, J. 1. This is an appeal by special leave filed by a defendant whose application under O. IX, r. 13, Civil Procedure Code to set aside an ex parte decree passed against him has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 12 1991

Arimboor Panchayat Improvement Trust Vs. Anthony and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-12-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1959 - Sections 4A; Kerala Court-fees and Suits Valuation (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR1992Ker308

Advocate for Appellant : P. Vijaya Bhanu, Adv.

ORDERK.T. Thomas, J.1. The question mooted in this revision relates to the Court-fee payable (or not payable) by a plaintiff whose suit was decreed ex parte. Suit was for money and the plaintiff at the time...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2007

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Rajeshwar Prasad

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-03-2007

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 - Sections 2, 11(1), 14 and 14(8); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Kumar Sinha and Jai Shankar, Advs.

S.N. Hussain, J.1. This Civil Revision has been filed under the proviso to Sub-section (8) of Section 14 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 1995

Gopalakrishna Kalamandir Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Kha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-08-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966; Limitation Act; Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - Sections 48 and 48(1); Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Rules, 1990 - Rule 21 and 21(1)

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ89AP

Bikshapathy, J.1. The petitioner is the cinema theatre. The 2nd Respondent is the workman/employee in the petitioner-theatre. The services of the 2nd Respondent were terminated by the petitioner-management on July 10, 1991. Aggrieved by the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2007

Fredric Charles Smith Vs. Alois Barla

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-04-2007

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR490(Jhr)]

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by defendant No. 2--petitioner challenging the judgment xand order dated 8.6.2006 passed by District Judge, West Singhbhum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial