Advanced Search Results
Erla Susheela and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its General Ma ...
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-17-2009
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A
2010(1)ALT428
Eranki Phani Kumar, Adv.
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. Erla Narasinga Rao, the husband of the 1st appellant, father of the 2nd appellant, son of appellants 3 and 4, and brother of appellants 5 and 6, was a resident of Luxettipet...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMylapore Rajeswari Devi Vs. Ponnamanda Lakshmi Bai and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-08-2006
Civil
Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(2)
2006(3)ALD212
Eranki Phani Kumar, Adv.
ORDERL. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The petitioner presented a plaint in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, with a prayer to pass a decree for partition of Plaints-A and B-Schedule properties, in the manner pleaded by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed SardaruddIn Vs. Syed Khaja Moinuddin
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-02-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN45(AP)
R. Raghunandan for the Appellant Eranki Phani Kumar for the Respondent.
The concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Courts of learned Junior Civil Judge, Shadnagar and learned II Additional District Judge, Mahabubnagar, are under challenge in this second appeal. This is the second round of litigation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vempati Sarada Vs. Vempati Kaladhar
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-27-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 23(3) and 25
2003(3)ALD496
R.V. Nagabhushana Rao, Adv.
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J. 1. The petitioner/wife filed the transfer CMP under Section 23(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') praying for transfer of O.P.No. 41 of 2002 on the file...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askimtiyaz HussaIn Vs. T. Durgamala and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-20-2001
Service
Constitution of India - Article 14
2001(6)ALD375; 2001(5)ALT653
P.V. Subrahmanyam Sarma, Adv.
S.B. Sinha, CJ 1. The question that arises for consideration in this appeal is under what circumstances Letters Patent would lie - either against an order refusing to review the original order of the original order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskY. Ramamani Vs. M. Bikshapathi
Andhra Pradesh
Sep-12-2006
Contract
Transfer of Property Act - Sections 58 and 106
2007(4)ALD67
E. Phani Kumar, Adv. in SA Nos. 248 and 322 of 1994 and ;B. Dayakar Reddy, Adv. in S.A. No. 279 of 1994
L. Narsimha Reddy, J.1. These three second appeals are between the same parties and in respect of the same subject-matter. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.Utheja Vs. S.Sriniva
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-23-2013
Education
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4286 OF201323-12-2013 P.Utheja .....Petitioner S.Srinivas ....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Smt.D.Pramada Counsel for the respondent:Sr.Eranki Phani Kumar : Cases referred : 1 (2007) 4 SCC3432 (2003) 1 SCC5573 2006...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhu Wines and ors. Vs. Special Chief Secretary, Revenue (Excise-ii) ...
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-24-2005
Excise
Andhra Pradesh Excise Act; Andhra Pradesh Excise Rules; Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 3, 23, 23B, 26A, 26A(2), 31, 69, 69(1) and 70; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 37, 41, 44 and 47
2005(2)ALD762; 2005(3)ALT137
P. Sri Raghuram, ;A. Sudershan Reddy, ;G.V.S. Mehar Kumar, ;P. Balamukunda Rao, ;G.V. Shivaji, ;O. Manohar Reddy, ;S. Thamasa Rani, ;G. Jhansi, ;A. Jagannatha Rao, ;Eranki Phani Kumar, ;Gopala Rao Gan
L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions, some of the existing licensees of IL-24 wine shops in the State of Andhra Pradesh, challenge the validity of the amendment to Rule 26-A of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN. Narsingarao Vs. Srinivasa Chary and Another
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-21-2010
Negotiable Instruments
Negotiable Instruments Act - sections 138, 139
Sri Eranki Phani Kumar, Adv.
1.Unsuccessful complainant in the case relating to offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short, the Act) is the appellant herein. He filed C.C.No.289 of 2003 on the file of Special Judicial...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›