Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: e x joseph and · Page 1 of about 148 results (0.234 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Jul 20 1995

Balvinder Kaur Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-20-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 15

Reported in : ILR1997Delhi134

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Singh,; E.X. Joseph and; S.T. Siddiqui, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The petitioner, Smt. Balwinder Kaur was commissioned in the Military Nursing Services (in short MNS) as Lieutenant on 1 June 1988. She was on probation for a period of two years. During this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Oct 28 1980

S.L. Sachdev and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-28-1980

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : AIR1980SC411; 1980LabIC1321; (1980)4SCC562; [1981]1SCR971; 1981(1)SLJ115(SC); 1980(12)LC985(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : E.X. Joseph and; N.S. Das Bahl, Adv

Y.V. Chandrachud, C.J.1. This is a Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution by which the petitioners ask for an appropriate writ quashing the orders dated May 29, 1965 and May 16, 1975 issued by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Mar 13 2003

Satya Pal Sud, Ex-brigadier Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the Chie ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Army Act - Sections 52; Army Rules - Rule 97 and 97(2)

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)774; 2003CriLJ3842; 104(2003)DLT35; 2003(71)DRJ514; 2003(3)SLJ450(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : E.X. Joseph, Sr. Adv. and; Abhay N. Das, Adv

Vijender Jain, J. 1. This appeal has been filed aggrieved by the order dated 5th July, 1999 passed by the learned Single Judge. Mr. E.X. Joseph, learned senior counsel for the appellant has contended that in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Mar 04 1997

P.D. Yadav Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Navy Pension Rules, 1964 - Rule 15(2)

Reported in : 1997IIAD(Delhi)901; 66(1997)DLT832; 1997(41)DRJ172

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjeev Ralli,; Harish Uppal, ; E.X. Joseph and;

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.(1) These two writ petitions arising under the Navy Act, 1957 have been referred to a Full bench for being disposed of Along with Cwp 2813/94, 2866/90 and 4706/94 arising under the Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Jan 28 1993

Alpine Industries Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-28-1993

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ236

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Banati and; E.X. Joseph, Advs

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) This is a petition under Sections 14, 17 and 29 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, on behalf of the. petitioner M/s Alpine Industries, for directing respondent no.2 to file the award dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 01 1995

inalsa Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-01-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11B

Reported in : 60(1995)DLT873

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; P. Shroff,; E.X. Joseph,;

Usha Mehra, J. (1) Inalsa Limited, the petitioner herein is Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act. It has five existing Small Scale Undertakings manufacturing different products First small scale industrial undertaking was set up at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 13 1995

inalsa Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 3

Reported in : [1996]87CompCas599(Delhi); 1996(36)DRJ349

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Jaitley,; P. Shroff,; E.X. Joseph,;

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Inalsa Limited, the petitioner herein is Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act. It has five existing Small Scale Undertakings manufacturing different products. First small scale industrial undertaking was set up at 8/9...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Nov 27 1996

A.K. Chawla Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-27-1996

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VAD(Delhi)604; 1997(40)DRJ192

Advocate for Appellant : A. Subhashni,; E.X. Joseph,; Jyoti Singh,;

Jaspal Singh, J. (1) Consequent upon the interview of the petitioner A.K. Chawla by the Public Enterprises Selection Board for the post of Director of Finance in Schedule-C in the Rural Electrification Corporation, he received an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
May 08 1996

Lajwanti Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-08-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956; Slum Area (Improvement and Clearance) Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 63(1996)DLT854

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Venkataraman,; E.X. Joseph,; S.T. Siddiqui and;

C.M. Nayar, J. (1) The present petition is filed for : (A)a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ praying for the quashing of Impugned order dated 30th March, 1989 acquiring the property No. 797/VIII,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask
Sep 19 1997

Saroj Srivastava Vs. Rajya Sabha Secretariat

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850; Rajya Sabha Secretariate (Recruitment and Condition of Service) Rules, 1957 - Rules 16 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 311(2)

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)245; 70(1997)DLT424; 1997(43)DRJ350

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatagi,; Ajit Pudusery,; E.X. Joseph and;

Usha Mehra, J. (1) RULE. (2) Since a short point is involved in this writ petitioner hence it was taken up for disposal. (3) The petitioner has assailed the order of penalty imposed by the disciplinary...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales