Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: e subrahmanyam · Page 1 of about 19 results (0.077 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 26 1968

Namilla Rachayya Vs. Gajula Nunna Narayanappa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-26-1968

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Debt Law; Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938 - Sections 9 and 13

Reported in : AIR1970AP278

Advocate for Appellant : E. Subrahmanyam and ;S.V. Sundarajan, Advs.

Krishnarao, J.1. The appellant who is the plaintiff, filed a suit O. S. No. 197 of 1962 in the Court of the District Munisf, Dharmavaram for recovery of Rupees 1300/- due under a simple mortgage bond...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1987

Narsimhulu and ors. Vs. Manemma

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-1987

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR1988AP309

Advocate for Appellant : E. Subrahmanyam, Adv.

1. An interesting question of law, whether the widow of coparcener who is found unchaste on the date of his demise is disqualified to inherit his estate as a Class 1 heir under the Hindu Succession...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 1965

Kommapalle Narayana Reddy and ors. Vs. Kalavapalle Venkatramanappa and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-19-1965

Subject : Civil

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 18; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 and 152

Reported in : AIR1966AP329

Advocate for Appellant : E. Subrahmanyam, Adv.

Gopalakrishna Nair, J.1. This civil miscellaneous appeal is preferred against the judgment of the subordinate Judge, Chittoor who, on appeal reversed the judgment and decree of the District Munsif, Madanapalle in O. S. No. 410 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 1981

K. Gangulappa Naidu and ors. Vs. K. Gangi Naidu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1981

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104(1) and 104(2) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1982AP284

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghunadha Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a revision field against the order in C. M. P. 37 of 1981 granting interim injunction pending disposal of A. S. No. 22 of 1981 on the file of the Additional District Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 1975

S.N. Joshi Vs. the Railway Board and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-21-1975

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1975)IILLJ273AP

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. E. Subrahmanyam

Ramachandra Rao, J.1. The petitioner herein was selected to Class I post after being successful in the competitive examination held by the Union Public Service Commission, New-Delhi, in the year 1956 and in the interview held...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1974

Commissioner of Gift-tax Vs. Budur Thippaiah

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-26-1974

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 5(1)

Reported in : [1976]103ITR189(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : P. Rama Rao, Adv.

Obul Reddy, C.J.1. The question referred for our decision under Section 26(6) of the Gift-tax Act by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is :'Whether the gift of Rs. 5,000 made by the assessee to his mother is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1982

E. Managamma Vs. A. Muniswamy Naidu

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-1982

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 43, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 4

Reported in : AIR1983AP128

Advocate for Appellant : E. Subrahmanyam, Adv.

P.A. Choudary, J.1. C.R.P. No. 1934 of 1978 is referred to a Division Bench by narasinga Rao, J., on the question whether a defendant -respondent, in an appeal under O. 43 R. 1 (r) of civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1967

Dasa K. Lakshmiah Vs. Union Government and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-26-1967

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1972 - Sections 151 and 152; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 77; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101- 104; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80, 100 and 101

Reported in : AIR1969AP386a

Advocate for Appellant : T.S. Narasinga Rao and ;E. Subrahmanyam, Advs.

1. The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal. The appeal arises out of a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 770 principal and interest. The defendant is the Railway Administration which is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1971

Punam Chand Hastimal Co. and ors. Vs. Sugavasi Venkataswamy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-18-1971

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 35 - Schedule - Article 1; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1972AP282

Advocate for Appellant : E. Subrahmanyam, Adv.

1. Defendant No. 5, representing the D-1 firm, as concurrently found by the Courts below, took a handloan of Rs. 4,000/- from the plaintiff on 27-3-1962 promising to repay it within two days. He could not...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1968

M. Kista Reddy and ors. Vs. Collector, Karimnagar Panchayat Wing and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-08-1968

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayata Act, 1964 - Sections 2(5), 16 to 25, 25(2), 50, 50(4) and 232; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226

Reported in : AIR1970AP180

Advocate for Appellant : P.A. Choudary, ;T.S. Narasinga Rao, ;E. Subrahmanyam, ;A. Reghuvir, ;Y. Satyanarayana, ;D.V. Reddipantulu, ;A. Venkatramana, ;B.P. Jeevan Reddy, ;V. Madhava Reddy and ;P. Shivshanker, Advs.

Sambasiva Rao, J. 1. Common questions arise in all these writ petitions and, therefore, they may be conveniently disposed of together. 2. The petitioners were Sarpanchas of Gram Panchayats. They were intimated bay their respective District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial