Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: e s kiresur · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.033 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 08 2002

Dy. Cit Vs. H.V. Shantharam

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]123TAXMAN1093(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Indra Kumar, for the Revenue B.V. Acharya and E.S. Kiresur for the Assessee

ORDERThe petitioner in this petition is the Deputy Commissioner. In this petition, the petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order dated 17-6-2002 passed by the Tribunal in Misc. Petition No. 54 of 2002,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2003

Ranganatha Associates and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-17-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1998 - Sections 90 and 96; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 245

Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Kar)441

Advocate for Appellant : G. Sarangan, Adv. for ;E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

ORDERR. Gururajan, J. 1. Petitioner M/s Ranganatha Associates is seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the endorsements at Annexure-G, dt. 17th June, 1999, and Annexure-J, dt. 5th Aug., 1999, in addition to seeking a direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2005

Kr. Muralidhar Vs. Life Insurance Corpn. of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]144TAXMAN572(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur for the Petitioner. Sriyuths V.C. Brahmarayappa, M.V. Seshachala, M.K. Bopaiab, N. Devdas, D. Gangadhara and A. Mahabaleshwar 13hat for the Respondent.

ORDERPetitioners are all employees of Life Insurance Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as the 'LIC') and are working as Development Officers in the various branches of the Corporation.2. In these petitions, petitioners'have sought for quashing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 17 2003

Asstt. Cit Vs. C.N. Ananthram

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-17-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]135TAXMAN477(Ker)

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Indrakumar for the Revenue E.S. Kiresur for the Assessee.

P. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.This appeal is by the revenue. In this appeal, filed under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the appellant has called in question the correctness...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2002

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.V. Shantharam

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-08-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254 and 260A; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2003)179CTR(Kar)114; ILR2003KAR1877; [2003]260ITR156(KAR); [2003]260ITR156(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : E.R. Indra Kumar, Adv.

P. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. The petitioner in this petition is the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax. In this petition, the petitioner has called in question the correctness of the order dated June 17, 2002, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2005

K.R. Muralidhar and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and o ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 10, 10(14) and 17; Income-Tax Rules - Rule 2BB

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(Kar)149; [2005]274ITR459(KAR); [2005]274ITR459(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. The petitioners are all employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (for short 'the LIC') and are working as Development Officers in the various branches of the Corporation.2. In these petitions,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 07 1996

Canara Bank Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-07-1996

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : ILR1996KAR810; 1996(40)KarLJ467

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

M.L. Pendse, C.J.1. An Interesting question as to whether a banking company under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, can be treated as a 'dealer' under section 2(1)(k) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, while realising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1999

Shree Someshwara Farmers Co-operative Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Joint Co ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-07-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143, 143(1), 156, 220 and 226(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1999]236ITR829(KAR); [1999]236ITR829(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

V.K. Singhal, J.1. By this petition, notice issued under Section 226(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has been assailed. Argument of learned counsel for the petition is two fold.2. First, it is stated that against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1999

Gopal Films Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-18-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 264; Constitution of India - Article 226; Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 88, 95 and 143(1)

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(Kar)428; ILR1999KAR1857; [1999]237ITR655(KAR); [1999]237ITR655(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

R. V. Raveendran, J.1. Sri M. V. Seshachala, learned counsel for the Income-tax Department, is directed to take notice for the respondents.2. In regard to the return of income submitted by the petitioner-firm for the assessment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1998

Naveen Traders Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 5(1A) and 5(3)

Reported in : [1998]111STC351(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : E.S. Kiresur, Adv.

Y. Bhaskar Rao, J.1. This is an appeal filed assailing the order of the Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Belgaum zone, Belgaum, dated April 18, 1995.2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial