Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: e raja · Page 1 of about 58 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 1984

Alankar theatre Vs. Entertainment Tax Officer, Warangal

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1984

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 4(1); Madras Local Authorities Entertainments Tax Act, 1926; Madras Entertainments Tax (Andhra Pradesh Extension and Amendment) Act, 1958; Andhra Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955

Reported in : [1991]82STC417(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Dasaratharama Reddy, ;K. Raji Reddy, ;B. Subhadhan Reddy, ;Rajiv Indani, ;M.B. Rama Sarma, ;M.R.K. Chowdary, ;P. Babul Reddy, ;G.R. Subhramanyam, ;E. Raja Rao, ;M. Adinarayana Raju, ;M. Rajasekhara

Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Taxes on cinema entertainment in the State of Andhra Pradesh are levied and governed by the Andhra Pradesh Entertainments Tax Act, 1939 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Act was made by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2003

Ramesh and Nagendran Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-17-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374(2)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ70

Advocate for Appellant : B. Mohan, Adv. for ;K.P. Ananthakrishnan, Adv. in C.A. No. 614/99, ;E. Raja, Addl. Public Prosecutor in C.A. No. 727/1999 and ;C.M. Gunasekaran, Adv. in C.A. No. 936/1999

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Nagendran and Ramesh are accused Nos. 1 and 2 respectively in Sessions Case No. 316/1998 on the file of the V Additional Sessions Court, Chennai and they have been convicted for the offences...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1999

R. Sivalingam and 105 Others Vs. State by the Inspector of Police C.B. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-26-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 158, 161, 173(3) (8), 190, 321 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 114, 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 332, 336, 353, 427 and 506; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC713

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. E. Raja, Adv.

ORDER1. The above petition has been preferred under Section 482, Cr.P.C. to call for the records in C.C.No.13 of 1997, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-VII, Trichy and to quash the proceedings. 2. Admittedly,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 1976

Navadu Nuka Raju Vs. Rajani China Appanna and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-14-1976

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 33, Rules 2 and 5

Reported in : AIR1977AP15

Advocate for Appellant : E. Raja Rao, Adv.

ORDER1. A point of some import is raised in this revision petition. It relates to applications for leave to file suit in forma pauperis. The question is whether a duty is cast on an applicant for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2006

Mr. B. Raman, Vs. Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd., Rep. by Its Company ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-2006

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 7, 138, 141 and 142; Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : II(2007)BC499; 2006CriLJ4552; 2007(1)KLT106

Advocate for Appellant : B. Kumar, Sr. Counsel for ;M. Aravind Subramaniam, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The question posed before this Division Bench is as follows : In the absence of individual notice under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, to be served on the director of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2005

Ayyanar and Allimuthu Vs. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-06-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 341 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2005(4)CTC174

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, S.C. for ;N.A. Ravindran, Adv. for Appellant No. 1 and ;S. Shanmugavelayutham, Adv. for Appeallant No. 2

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. Ayyanar (A1) and Allimuthu (A2) were tried for the offences under Sections 341 and 302 read with 34 I.P.C. The trial Court, ultimately, convicted both the accused finding them guilty in respect of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2002

Rakiappan, Subramanian, Somaraj and Aarusamy Vs. State By: Inspector o ... Overruled

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-25-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 34, Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 109, Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Muthusamy, S.C. for A.K. Sridharan, Adv. and N. Jothi, Adv.

R. Balasubramanian, J.1. Accused 1 to 4 in S.C.No.192 of 1997 on the file of Court of Sessions, Erode, are the appellants in this appeal. At the end of the trial, A.2 and A.3 were found...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1988

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Andhra Pradesh Housing Board

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-17-1988

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act - Sections 2(1); Andhra Pradesh Housing Board Act - Sections 21; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act; Bombay Sales Tax Act; Madras Sales Tax Act

Reported in : [1988]70STC203(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : A. Venkataramana, Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes

Y.V. Anjaneyulu, J.1. These two tax revision cases are filed by the State and they relate to the assessment years 1973-74 and 1975-76. The A.P. Housing Board is the respondent. It appears the Commercial Tax Officer,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2002

Mayavan @ Ravi Rauya and Gokulakrishnan @ Gokul Vs. State Rep. by Insp ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 342, 363, 366, 366A, 376 and 376(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4426

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, S.C. for ;C.S.S. Pillai, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The appellants/A1 and A2 were convicted for the offences under Sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(g) I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2014

K.Parasuraman Vs. 1.The Management,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-04-2014

Subject : Labour and Industrial

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.8459 of 2006 K.Parasuraman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Management, Southern Petro Chemical Industries Corporation Ltd., [Spic]., Tuticorin. 2.The Presiding Officer, Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial