Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: e padmanabhan · Page 1 of about 313 results (0.047 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 24 1982

Mohammed Ismail and anr. Vs. Khadirsa Rowther and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-24-1982

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 90 ; Muslim Law; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65

Reported in : AIR1983Mad123

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, ;Kannalan and ;P. Ramachandran, Advs.

Mohan, J. 1. The following genealogical tree sets out the relationship of the parties:-(See genealogical table below) Defendants 7 to 22 third party purchasers or their legal representatives from defendants 1 and 2.Khadirsa Rowther, the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1996

M. Radhakrishnan Vs. the District Educational Officer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-29-1996

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC133; (1996)IIMLJ464

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 129 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Palani is the appellant in the above second appeal. He filed the suit for declaration declaring that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2009

State of Tamil Nadu and ors. Vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Minority Schools (Recognition and Pay of Grant) Rules, 1977 - Rule 6(2)

Reported in : JT2009(13)SC78; (2009)8MLJ1667(SC); 2009(12)SCALE57; (2009)9SCC386:2009AIRSCW6717

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv. and; S. Thananjaya, Adv

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu and its functionaries have preferred this appeal by special leave against the judgment dated March 18, 2008 passed by the Division Bench of Madras High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 11 1991

P. Ponniah Vs. Estate Officer, Southern Railways, Madurai and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-1991

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1976 - Sections 5(1); Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1991Mad388; (1991)IIMLJ12

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Adv.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioner in W. P. No. 2377 of 1986 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition arc the respondents in the writ appeal. We are referring to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2009

P.K. Palanisamy Vs. N. Arumugham and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court Fees' Act, 1870 - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Army Act - Sections 20 and 22; Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115, 148, 149 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC498(SC); JT2009(10)SC79; 2010(2)MhLJ84(SC); (2009)8MLJ123(SC); 2009(10)SCALE79; (2009)9SCC173

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv. and; V. Mohana, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 28th November, 2008 passed by a learned single judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby and whereunder a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1989

T. Savariraj Pillai Vs. M/S. R.S.S. Vastrad and Company

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1989

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(3); Chit Funds Act - Sections 25

Reported in : AIR1990Mad198

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Adv.

ORDER1. Defendant in O. S. No. 1293 of 1984 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli is the petitioner. Plaintiff is the sole respondent. Plaintiff filed the suit based on equitable mortgage and for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1992

M. Santhanakrishnan Vs. Corpn. of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-1992

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Fundamental Rules - Rule 56; Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 85

Reported in : (1993)IILLJ1214Mad

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner challenges a communication sent by the first respondent to the petitioner instructing him to issue notice to the Government for orders on his request for voluntary retirement since the earlier notice sent by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1978

Aruppukottai Sri Jaya Vilas (P.) Ltd. Vs. K.N. Karuppiah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-07-1978

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 9, Rule 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1978Mad384

Advocate for Appellant : E. Padmanabhan, Adv.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 380 of 1972, on the file of the District Munsif of Sattur, is the petitioner in this revision. The respondents herein are the defendants in the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1992

A.C.A. Ganapathy Mudaliar Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-12-1992

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1992(60)ELT525(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E. Padmanabhan, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner's wife V. S. Muthammal was a licensee in respect of manufacture of safety matches under L.4 Licence No. 1/M/70. With the reference to the manufacture of matches during the years 1969-70 to 1973-74,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1996

P. Thangaraj and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Cor ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-16-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Madurai City Municipal Corporation Service Rules, 1973 - Rules 27 and 47; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sectioin 161

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ668Mad; (1996)IIMLJ416

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioners have sought for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with orders of the Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, issued in E-1/970/66/77 dated April 26, 1978, the order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial