Advanced Search Results
Mohammed Ismail and anr. Vs. Khadirsa Rowther and ors.
Chennai
Feb-24-1982
Trusts and Societies
Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 90 ; Muslim Law; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65
AIR1983Mad123
E. Padmanabhan, ;Kannalan and ;P. Ramachandran, Advs.
Mohan, J. 1. The following genealogical tree sets out the relationship of the parties:-(See genealogical table below) Defendants 7 to 22 third party purchasers or their legal representatives from defendants 1 and 2.Khadirsa Rowther, the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Radhakrishnan Vs. the District Educational Officer and ors.
Chennai
Mar-29-1996
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34
1997(1)CTC133; (1996)IIMLJ464
E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv.
ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. The plaintiff in O.S.No. 129 of 1979 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Palani is the appellant in the above second appeal. He filed the suit for declaration declaring that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Tamil Nadu and ors. Vs. Amala Annai Higher Secondary School
Supreme Court of India
Aug-28-2009
Constitution
Tamil Nadu Minority Schools (Recognition and Pay of Grant) Rules, 1977 - Rule 6(2)
JT2009(13)SC78; (2009)8MLJ1667(SC); 2009(12)SCALE57; (2009)9SCC386:2009AIRSCW6717
E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv. and; S. Thananjaya, Adv
R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted. 2. The State of Tamil Nadu and its functionaries have preferred this appeal by special leave against the judgment dated March 18, 2008 passed by the Division Bench of Madras High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Ponniah Vs. Estate Officer, Southern Railways, Madurai and Others
Chennai
Feb-11-1991
Property
Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1976 - Sections 5(1); Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act, 1922 - Sections 3
AIR1991Mad388; (1991)IIMLJ12
E. Padmanabhan, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioner in W. P. No. 2377 of 1986 is the appellant in this writ appeal. The respondents in the writ petition arc the respondents in the writ appeal. We are referring to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.K. Palanisamy Vs. N. Arumugham and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-23-2009
Civil
Court Fees' Act, 1870 - Sections 4; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 54; Army Act - Sections 20 and 22; Limitation Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115, 148, 149 and 151 - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 227
2010(1)AWC498(SC); JT2009(10)SC79; 2010(2)MhLJ84(SC); (2009)8MLJ123(SC); 2009(10)SCALE79; (2009)9SCC173
E. Padmanabhan, Sr. Adv. and; V. Mohana, Adv
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 28th November, 2008 passed by a learned single judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras whereby and whereunder a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Savariraj Pillai Vs. M/S. R.S.S. Vastrad and Company
Chennai
Nov-03-1989
Commercial
Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1(3); Chit Funds Act - Sections 25
AIR1990Mad198
E. Padmanabhan, Adv.
ORDER1. Defendant in O. S. No. 1293 of 1984 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli is the petitioner. Plaintiff is the sole respondent. Plaintiff filed the suit based on equitable mortgage and for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Santhanakrishnan Vs. Corpn. of Madras and anr.
Chennai
Aug-25-1992
Labour and Industrial
Fundamental Rules - Rule 56; Madras City Municipal Corporation Act, 1919 - Sections 85
(1993)IILLJ1214Mad
E. Padmanabhan, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner challenges a communication sent by the first respondent to the petitioner instructing him to issue notice to the Government for orders on his request for voluntary retirement since the earlier notice sent by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAruppukottai Sri Jaya Vilas (P.) Ltd. Vs. K.N. Karuppiah and ors.
Chennai
Mar-07-1978
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10(2) - Order 9, Rule 5(1) and 5(2)
AIR1978Mad384
E. Padmanabhan, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The plaintiff in O. S. No. 380 of 1972, on the file of the District Munsif of Sattur, is the petitioner in this revision. The respondents herein are the defendants in the said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.C.A. Ganapathy Mudaliar Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise
Chennai
Mar-12-1992
Excise
1992(60)ELT525(Mad)
Shri E. Padmanabhan, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioner's wife V. S. Muthammal was a licensee in respect of manufacture of safety matches under L.4 Licence No. 1/M/70. With the reference to the manufacture of matches during the years 1969-70 to 1973-74,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Thangaraj and ors. Vs. the Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Cor ...
Chennai
Aug-16-1996
Labour and Industrial
Madurai City Municipal Corporation Service Rules, 1973 - Rules 27 and 47; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sectioin 161
(1997)ILLJ668Mad; (1996)IIMLJ416
N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioners have sought for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with orders of the Commissioner, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, issued in E-1/970/66/77 dated April 26, 1978, the order of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »