Advanced Search Results

Ceat Tyres of India Ltd. Vs. Nashik Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 3(4) and 493; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 131(2); Companies Act; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Bombay Municipal Corporation (Levy of Octroi) Rules, 1965 - Rule 25; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 136 and 226

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR466

Advocate for Appellant : E.P. Bharucha, Sr. Adv., ;Manoj Sanklecha, ;H.M. Vakil and ;D.D. Mehta, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla C.B.C.

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges Demand notices issued for collection of octroi duty by first respondent Municipal Corporation of Nashik. First respondent Corporation is constituted under the...

Santogen Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 32E(1) and 32F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(84)ECC74; 2002(143)ELT289(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : E.P. Bharucha, Senior Counsel and ;S.P. Bharucha, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Shri E.P. Bharucha for the petitioners and Shri A.J. Rana appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central Excise Additional Bench, Mumbai, (the...

Hb Stockholdings Limited, Gurgaon Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Company

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: E. P. Bharucha, (Sr.) with Tarun Dua, Arzan Balsara, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 - Kumar Desai, Ajay Khaire, R2 - P. N. Modi, Ranjit Bhosale, Ravichandra Hegde, Khursheed Vaj

P. K. Malhotra, Member and Officiating Presiding Officer 1. The appellant before us is aggrieved by the order dated March 31, 2011 passed by the whole time member of the Securities and Exchange Board of India...

Cheneena Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. E P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neville P. Lashkari and Mr.Joby Mathew, Advocates for Appellants. Mr. Saleh Doctor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anant Upadhyay and Mr. Tejas Joshi, Advocate fo

Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer This order will dispose of two Appeals no. 41 and 42 of 2007 both of which are directed against the same order dated 19.1.2007 passed by the whole time member of...

Anil Harish Vs. Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 299 and 299(1)

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR322; 2004(3)MhLj1044

Advocate for Appellant : Haresh Jagtiani, Adv. instructed by S.H. Gursahani, Adv. in W.P. No. 1429 of 1990, ;E.P. Bharucha and ;Sidharth Shah and ;Mihir Rale, Advs. and ;Anil Dsouza, Adv. instructed by S.H. Gursahani, Adv. in

A.P. Shah, J. 1. The petitioners are the owners of commercial units on 5th, 6th and 7th floor of Arun Chambers, Tardeo, Mumbai. The 1st respondent is the State of Maharashtra. In or about 1968 the...

M/S. Farohar and Company and Others Vs. Hemant Manohar Nabar and Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20, 30 and 33; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 12; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 29

Reported in : AIR1992Bom8; 1992(2)BomCR213

Advocate for Appellant : E.P. Bharucha and;Ms. Kher, Advs., i/b;M/s. Mulla and;Mulla Cragie Blunt and;Caroe

ORDER1. This is a petition u/S. 33 ofthe Arbitration Act, 1940 seeking to set aside an Award dated 26th March 1990 made by Shri N. A. Shah. Advocate. By an order dated 7th October 1988, Pendse,...

Shree Warana Sahakari Dudh Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2003)(155)ELT465Tri(Mum.)bai

1. In this matter, an application has been filed for rectification of mistake under Section 35C(2) of the Cental Excise Act, which was apparent on the record to rectify the defects in the Order dated 28.4.2001...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. A.K. Menon, Custodian and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992 - Sections 2 and 11(2); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(43), 220, 220(2), 234 and 271; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56; Provincial Insolvency Act, 1909

Reported in : 1996(5)BomCR564

Advocate for Appellant : T.R. Andhyarujina, Advocate General and ;M.S. Doctor, Adv. as Amicus Curie, ;A.M. Setalvad and ;G.R. Joshi, Advs., i/b P. M. Mithi & Co., for the Custodian, ;A.K. Bobde, S.G. Mandrekar and ;B. Cha

S.N. Variava, J.1. This Court has been functioning since June 1992. Now so far as two Notified Parties are concerned, viz., the Harshad Mehta Group and Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd., the time is approaching for distribution...

Narang Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales TaxCustoms

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 286 and 286(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(12), 2(13) and 7; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 23(1) and 23(2)

Reported in : [2004]135STC289(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal, Adv. and ;Aspi Chinoi, Senior Counsel, ;B.C. Joshi, Senior Adv., ;Akhil Sibal, Adv. and ;D.G. Jhangiani, Adv., i/b., Jhangiani, Narula and Associates

V.C. Daga, J. 1. This petition raises an interesting but intricate question as to whether sale of eatables or goods to foreign airlines for consumption on board during the period such aircraft is a foreign going...

Bharat Biotech International Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumb ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (S.A. Bobde, J.) 1. Heard Mr Aspi Chinoy, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners,Mr. E.P.Bharucha, learned Senior Counsel for respondent-nos.1 and 2 - M.C.G.M and Chief Engineer, Central Purchase Department, Mr M.M.Vashi, learned counsel...