Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dwarakanathan · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 10 1986

Management of Bombay Ammonia (Madras) Pvt. Ltd., Madras Vs. the Additi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : (1988)ILLJ203Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dwarakanathan

ORDER1. The second respondent was the employee of the petitioner as Senior Stenographer. By order dated 10th May 1978 her services were terminated. The said order reads as follows :- 'FromBombay Ammonia (Madras) Private Ltd.35, Mount...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1999

Management of Sundaram Industries Ltd. Vs. P.O., Labour Court and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-23-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2A, 10, 11A, 33, 33(1), 33(2) and 33(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ32Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Dwarakanathan, Adv.

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. The petitioner prays for the issue of writ of certiorari to call for the records in I.A. No. 125 of 1999 in I.D. No. 353 of 1992 on the file of the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1998

Mgmt. of Kodumudi Growers Co.Operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-08-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(OO) and 25F

Reported in : (1999)ILLJ497Mad; (1999)IMLJ412

Advocate for Appellant : Dwarakanathan, Adv.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J. 1. Aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court in I.D. No. 46 of 1986 dated December 13, 1989 the management has filed the above writ petition. 2. The case of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 29 1989

T.C. Srinivasan Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Appellate Au ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-1989

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1990)1MLJ326

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.N. Ramesh

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order of the first respondent in T.S.E. No. 25 of 1982. That was an appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 41 (2) of the Tamil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1986

The Special Officer of the Management of T.U.C.S. Ltd., Madras-5 Vs. S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-1986

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10-A, 10-A(1), 10-A(2), 10-A(3), 10-A(5), 11-A and 12(3); Arbitration Act, 1940; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1986)IILLJ225Mad

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. These Writ Appeals are against a common order in Writ Petitions Nos. 1742 and 1743 of 1982. The first- respondent in the Writ Petitions is the appellant in the Writ Appeals. The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1999

Pattaraiswamy S. Vs. Management of Sundaram Industries Ltd., Madurai ( ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-08-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A and 33; Tamil Nadu Industrial Disputes Rules, 1958 - Rules 34, 35 and 39

Reported in : (2000)ILLJ881Mad

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Adv.

K.P. Sivasubramaniam, J.1. The appeal is directed against the order of the learned Judge in W.P. No. 12955 of 1999. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing the order of the Labour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1994

S. Varadarajan Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Labour and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-1994

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 20(1) and (2)

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ1144Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Chandru

ORDER1. The petitioner herein has filed this writ petition to issue appropriate writs, orders, or directions and in particular issue a writ in the nature of certified mandamus after calling for the concerned records from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1985

Metal Powder Co. Ltd., Tirumangalam and anr. Vs. the State of Tamil Na ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-1985

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3(2), 11A, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25B, 25B(1), 25B(2), 25F, 25N, 25-O and 25-O(2); Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 35; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2 and 14; Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act - Sections 14B

Reported in : (1985)IILLJ376Mad

ORDER1. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners challenging the constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, (Act 46 of 1981), hereinafter referred to as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1998

Krishna Ramanujam V. and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-1998

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishment (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 2(4), 2(1), 3, 3(1) and 5

Reported in : (2001)IIILLJ630Mad

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. Heard.W.P. Nos. 2972 and 18687 of 1992 and 963 of 1993 were filed by the workmen who are employed by the fourth respondent-cooperative spinning mill, as workmen in the category of N.M.Rs.2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 1996

The Management of Industrial Rubber Products Vs. the Regional Providen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-19-1996

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14B

Reported in : (1996)IILLJ1202Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Dwarakanathan, Adv.

ORDERS.M. Abdul wahab, J.1. W.P. No 10733 of 1987 is for quashing the order of the respondent dated July 24, 1987 claiming a sum of Rs. 19,549.60 from the petitioner.2. The case of the petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial