Advanced Search Results

Maheshwar Thakur Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.39 of 2003 =========================================================== Maheshwar Thakur, son of Late Satahu Thakur, resident of Cinema Road, Sursand, Police Station-Sursand, District-Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar...

Mukti Nath Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 309

Advocate for Appellant : Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Mithilesh Kr. Pathak and Javed Gaffar Khan, Advs.

Navin Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 27.10.2000 at Annexure-13. The impugned order reverts him to his status of a Grade IV post...

The State of Bihar and ors Vs. Arun Kumar Mishra

Court : Patna

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1398 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3157 of 2005 With Interlocutory Application No. 6762 of 2011 With Interlocutory Application No. 6763 of...

Arbind Kumar Pandey Vs. Kameshwar Singh Darbhanga Sanskrit University ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Madhup and Durganand Jha, Advs.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent No. 4 to appoint the petitioner to the post of Principal, Mahanth Shatanand Giri...

BipIn Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 309

Advocate for Appellant : Durganand Jha, Adv.

Ramesh Kumar Datta, J.1. The petitioners have approached this Court for a direction to the respondents-authorities to amend/delete the condition of examination imposed in selection of Junior Engineer (Civil) in Advertisement No. 1006 published in daily...

Braj Kishore Prasad and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and ors. Etc ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 - Sections 14(3); Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 21

Advocate for Appellant : Janardan Pd. Singh, Md. Abu Haidar, Anil Singh, Arbind Kr. Singh, Durganand Jha, Rupak Kumar andRatan Kumar Sinha, Advs.Rajesh Pd. Choudhary, Adv.

V.N. Sinha, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, the State and the Bihar State Co-operative Marketing Union Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'BISCOMAUN').2. The aforesaid two contempt applications have been filed asserting that BISCOMAUN has...

Binod Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Advocate for Appellant : Vishwanath Ram and Ajay Kumar, Advs.

Radha Mohan Prasad, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the office order dated 19.3.2004 of the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Dehri, whereby and whereunder his adjustment on the post...

Badri NaraIn Jha and ors. Vs. Rameshwar Dayal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1951SC186; [1951]2SCR153

Mahajan, J.1. This appeal arises out of Suit No. 9 of 1939 instituted in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Palamau by the appellants against the respondents for a number of declarations in respect to...

Nand Kumar Jha, Son of Shri Shiv Nandan Jha Vs. the State of Bihar Thr ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2256

Advocate for Appellant : Tuhin Shankar and; Rajnish Kumar, Advs.

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.1. Petitioner wants quashing of the office orders dated 9.8.2004 and 21.9.2004, annexures 1 and 2 respectively, issued by respondent Nos. 6 and 3, by virtue of which the promotion granted to the...

Saratchandra Sen Vs. Mrityunjay Ray Chaudhuri

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1935Cal336

ORDER1. This rule is directed against the orders of the Subordinate Judge of Rangpur, dated 1st August 1933, 8th August 1933, 11th August 1933 and also 23rd April 1934. It appears that the plaintiffs, opposite party,...