Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dulipsingh · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.020 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 1991

In Re: Ucal Fuel Systems Ltd. and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-20-1991

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10, 11, 14, 23, 391, 391(2), 392, 394, 394(1) and (2) and 394A; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 10, 11 and 14; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 23

Reported in : [1992]73CompCas63(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Dulipsingh, Adv.

Lakshmanan, J. 1. Company Petition No. 59 of 1990 was filed by Ucal Fuel Systems Limited, having its registered office at No. 118, Anna Salai, Madras 2, and Company petition No. 60 of 1990 was filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1977

A.M.P. Arunachalam Vs. A.R. Krishnamurthy and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-1977

Subject : CompanyProperty

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108; Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 2(2), 2(4), 2(7) and 36(3); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 130 and 137

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas662(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : T. Raghavan, Adv.

A.R. Krishnamurthy, J. 1. The second plaintiff in O.S. No. 7000 of 1969 is the appellant in A. S. No. 141 of 1973. The 6th defendant in O.S. No. 658 of 1970, who is the 9th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 1988

Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Ltd. Vs. Mohamad Argobasi Enterpris ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-18-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 14, Rule 2 and 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Article 51; International Law

Reported in : AIR1989AP286

Advocate for Appellant : K. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv.

ORDERSeetaram Reddy, J.1. The 2nd defendant, the revisionist herein, seeks to revise the orders passed by the trial Court. 2. The format in brief is that the plaintiff, the 1st respondent herein, filed a suit against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial