Advanced Search Results

National Spot Exchange Limited and Another Vs. P.D. Agro Processors Pv ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Notice of Motion No. 765 of 2014 is filed by the Applicant -- Mr. Sankaran Balasubramanian, original Defendant No. 15 in Suit No. 781 of 2014 and Notice of Motion No. 1388 of 2014 is...

Syndicate Bank Vs. East India Hotels Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6(1) and 6(4); Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR514; 2005(2)MhLj363

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, Sr. Adv. and ;Harvinder Toor, Adv., i/b., Crawfard Bayley & Co.

Devadhar J.P., J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 24-2-1995 wherein the preliminary issue of jurisdiction raised by the appellant defendant has been rejected by the learned Single Judge by holding that...

Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Mr. Gajendra Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 17 and 55(1); Factories Act; Copyright Act, 1914 - Sections 5; Copyright Act, 1911; Workmen's Compensation Act; Evidence Act - Sections 40 to 42 and 43; Dramatic Copyright Act, 1833

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR532; 2007(6)BomCR700; (2007)109BOMLR2072; 2008BusLR161(Bom); LC2007(3)299; 2008(36)PTC53(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv., ;Rahul Chitnis, ;Ankit Lohia and ;Ranjit Shetty, Advs., i/b., PDS Legal

S.J. Vazifdar, J.1. Defendant No. 2 is one Ms.Karuna Raju Samtani and Defendant No. 3 is Star (India) Limited.2. The suit is filed for a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiff's copyright in...

Pan India Paryatan Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(5) and 9C; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 226, 265 and 300A

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR233; 2007(4)MhLj202

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Tulzapurkar and ;S. Parekh, Advs., i/b., S.D.D. and ; Phatarphekar, Advs.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this common Judgment, we are disposing of Writ Petition No. 111 of 1996 and Writ Petition No. 2009 of 1998, which involves interpretation of certain provisions of Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923...

Rockwood Hotels and Resorts Limited Vs. Starwood Asia Pacific Hotels a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Oral Judgment: 1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks stay of the, implementation and or operation of the termination notice dated 17th December, 2012, issued...

POL India Projects Limited and Another Vs. Aurelia Reederei Eugen Frie ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Makhija

1. The petitioners in Arbitration Petition No.76 of 2012 which is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Arbitration Act) have impugned the final arbitral award dated 15th...

Shree Niwas Girni Kamgar Kruti Samiti Vs. Rangnath Basudev Somani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 391(6), 392, 392(2), 393, 394(A), 434, 439, 443, 466 and 643; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1913 - Sections 153; ;Sick Industrial Companies Special Provisions Act; ;Urban Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 10(5) and 20; ;Development Control Regulations, 2001 - Regulation 58

Reported in : 2005(4)BomCR708; [2005]127CompCas752(Bom); (2005)6CompLJ246(Bom); [2005]62SCL175(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Virendra Tulzapurkar, ;Anirudh Joshi, ;I. Chagla and ;Hiralal Thakkar, Advs.;P.G. Rao, Official Liquidator, ;Darius Khambata, ;Riyaz Chagla, ;Molina Thakur, ;B.R. Zaveri, ;Aspi Chinoy, ;A. Ramkrishna,

A.P. Shah, J.1. Appeals admitted.2. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, appeals were taken up for hearing. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Appeals are being disposed of by this...

Shree Rani Sati Investment and Finance Ltd. and anr. Etc. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ConstitutionContract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Import and Export Control Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 126

Reported in : AIR2004Bom424; 2004(4)BomCR81; 2005(2)CTLJ399(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : V.V. Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel and ; S. Paranjape, Advs., i/b., Kanga & Co. in W.P. Nos. 2496, 2497, 2498, 2517 and 2518/89 and ; K.R. Dhanuka, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 2687, 2688, 2730 and 2731/89

V.C. Daga, J.1. The story of this litigation pending in this Court since 1989, partly legal and partly administrative hinges upon the question whether the petitioners have committed breach of contractual obligations or the respondents are...

LupIn Limited Vs. Johnson and Johnson

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

P.C.: The plaintiff company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling pharmaceutical products. The defendant company is also engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling of pharmaceutical products. It is the...

LupIn Limited Vs. Johnson and Johnson

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

P.C.: The plaintiff company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling pharmaceutical products. The defendant company is also engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling of pharmaceutical products. It is the...