Advanced Search Results
Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Pune-iii
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-12-2010
Service Tax
Shri J.C. Patel, Advocate for Appellants. Dr. T.. Tiju, SDR Authorized Representative.
Per :Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) The issue involved in this case is whether the appellants are entitled for availment of CENVAT credit on garden maintenance service and repairs of deep freezerinstalled in canteen. 2. The learned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPeople Interactive (i)private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mu ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-12-2010
Land Acquisition
Shri R.M.Samria, C.A. for Appellant. Dr.T.Tiju, Authorized Representative (DR)
Per : P.G.Chacko This application filed by the applicant seeks out-of-turn disposal of their appeal. Moving this application, the ld.Consultant for the applicant submits that the lower authorities have rejected their refund claim on the ground...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Nayasa Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Exports), Nh ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-30-2010
Land Acquisition
For the Appellant : Shri Sanjay Agarwal with Shri Parag Shelke Advocate. For the Respondent : Dr. T. Tiju, SDR.
Per: Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) The appellants (exporter) have filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Customs (Exports) extending the time limit for issuing the show-cause notice for another period of six...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Baburao Bapuji Tanpure Ssk Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-22-2010
Excise
Shri S.B. Awate, Consultant for the appellant. Dr. T. Tiju, Authorised Representative (SDR) for the respondent.
Per: P.G. Chacko: The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of sugar. During the period December 1974 - September 1975, their total production was 6,17,280 quintals. Their average production of sugar for the corresponding periods of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Plastic Enterprises and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Ex ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-12-2010
Service Tax
Shri Jitu Motwani, Advocate for Appellants. Dr.T.Tiju, Authorized Representative (DR)
Per : P.G.Chacko After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeals have got to be summarily disposed of. Accordingly, after dispensing with pre-deposit, we take up the appeals....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Ruby Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-30-2010
Excise
For the Appellant : Shri Sanjay Dwidei, Advocate. For the Respondent : Dr. T. Tiju, SDR.
Per: Shri P. Karhikeyan After hearing both sides on the stay application for some time, I find that the issue involved lies in a narrow compass and the appeal itself can be disposed of. Accordingly, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva Vs. Panasonic Battery India Co Lt ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-29-2010
Land Acquisition
Dr T. Tiju, SDR, for Appellant. Shri G.S. Dave, Assistant Manager, for Respondent.
1. In this application filed by the Revenue (appellant), the prayer is to stay the operation of the impugned order, wherein the learned Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) condoned the heavy delay involved in the filing of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (import) Nhava Sheva Vs. M/S Elegant Sales Cor ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-11-2010
Land Acquisition
Dr. T. Tiju, SDR, for appellant
Per: P.G. Chacko, Member (Judicial) This appeal was filed by the department. There is no representation for the respondent despite notice (notice of hearing was served on them through the Commissionerate), nor any request for adjournment....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva Vs. Sterling Agro Industries Ltd
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-16-2010
Land Acquisition
Dr T. Tiju, S.D.R.
Per: Mr P.G. Chacko 1. There is no representation for the respondent in this appeal filed by the Revenue. However, their written submissions are available on record, which says that they do not want to be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Corp Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-02-2010
Excise
Shri T. Viswanathan, Advocate for the appellant. Dr. T.Tiju, Authorized Representative (SDR) for the respondent.
Per: P.G. Chacko: The appellant had imported raw materials under DEEC scheme and cleared the same duty-free under Notification No. 203/92-Cus, without fulfilling Condition No. V(a) of the notification, which required that no input stage credit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »