Advanced Search Results
Tanna Builders (P) Ltd. Vs. Smt. Neela Krishnan and anr.
Mumbai
Aug-16-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)198CTR(Bom)541
P.J. Pardiwalla i/b Kanga & Co., for the Petitioner Dr. P, Daniel with A.S. Rao i/b Pankaj Kapoor, for the Respondents
V.C. DAGA, J.This petition is directed against the validity of the notice dated 4-11-1991 issued by the respondent No. 1 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter referred to as ).Factual...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNh Securities Ltd. Vs. Dcit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jul-27-2006
Direct Taxation
1. These are two cross appeals. The relevant assessment year is 2000-01. These cross appeals are directed against the order of the CIT(A)-VII at Mumbai dated 17-02-2004. The appeals arise out of the assessment completed Under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Sorabji Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jun-23-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)96TTJ(Mum.)524
1. The Hon'ble President of the Tribunal has referred the following questions to the Special Bench under Section 255(3) of the Act, 1961, for decision : "(1) Whether the decision of Delhi Special Bench of Tribunal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dy. Cit Central Circle 31 Vs. Pallavi Holdings (P.) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Aug-01-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)5SOT190(Mum.)
This is a bunch of three appeals. The common assessment year is 1992-93. The appeal in ITA No. 1912/Mum/2000 is filed by the revenue.The said appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Cent....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Sorabji Vs. Ito, Ward 20(1)(2)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Jun-23-2005
Direct Taxation
(2005)95ITD540(Mum.)
This Hon'ble President of the Tribunal has referred the following questions to the Special Bench under section 255(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for decision: "(1) Whether the decision of Delhi Special Bench of ITAT in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBativala and Karani Vs. Asstt. Cit
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Dec-28-2004
Direct Taxation
(2005)2SOT379(Mum.)
These cross-appeals are directed against the order dated 29-9-1995 passed by the CIT(A) in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for the assessment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Gore Vs. Ito
Mumbai
Mar-23-2001
Direct Taxation
(2002)74TTJ(Mumbai)404
Dr. P. Daniel, for the Assessee Mudit Nagpal, for the Revenue
ORDERM.A. Bakshi, V.P.We find it convenient to dispose of these two appeals of the assessee for assessment year 1994-95 by this consolidated order. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused.2. We first take up the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›