Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dipankar p gupta · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 05 1999

M/S. Motiram Tolaram and anr. Vs. the Union of India and anr. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-1999

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1999SC3121; 1999(66)ECC61; 1999LC48(SC); 1999(112)ELT749(SC); JT1999(6)SC48; 1999(4)SCALE666; (1999)6SCC375; [1999]Supp1SCR82

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar P. Gupta,; Prashant Bhushan,; Ramesh Singh Jaitley

ORDER1. Normally it is the assessee who does tax planning but this is a case where one finds that it is the Revenue which has done tax collection planning.2. The appellants imported consignments of polyvinyl alcohol...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2003

Pure Helium India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30; Indian Income Tax Act; Indian Income Tax Rules; Indian Income Regulation; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 - Sections 40; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2003SC4519; 2003(3)ARBLR409(SC); JT2003(Suppl2)SC596; 2003(8)SCALE553; (2003)8SCC593; [2003]48SCL229(SC); 2004(1)LC77(SC); MANU/SC/0803/2003

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; Ashok Mathur, Adv

S.B. Sinha, J. 1. Whether jurisdiction of an arbitrator to interpret a contract can be subject-matter of an objection under Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for the sake...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1997

Vineet NaraIn and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-1997

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 141, 142 and 144; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 4 and 4(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5 and 6; Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 19

Reported in : AIR1998SC889; 1998CriLJ1208; JT1997(10)SC247; 1999(1)SCALE442; (1998)1SCC226; [1997]Supp6SCR595

Advocate for Appellant : Anil B. Divan, Sr. Adv. (Amicus curiae),; Abani Kumar Sahu,; A

J.S. Verma, C.J.1. These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India brought in public interest, to begin with, did not appear to have the potential of escalating to the dimensions they reached or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 20 2017

Thyssen Krupp Materials Ag vs.the Steel Authority of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2017

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Misha Rohatagi, Mr. Umang Gupta, Mr. Karan Luthra

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:25. 04.2016 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 04.2017 FAO (OS) 150/2002 THYSSEN KRUPP MATERIALS AG ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rishi Agarwala with Ms. Misha Rohatagi,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 1996

Dr. D.C. Saxena, Contemnor Vs. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-19-1996

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 3, 14, 19, 19(2), 32, 51, 124(4), 121, 129, 136, 145(3), 211, 215 and 235; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968; Judicial Officers Protection Act; Judges (Protection) Act; Prevention of Corruption Act

Reported in : 1996VAD(SC)404; AIR1996SC2481; 1996CriLJ3274; JT1996(6)SC529; 1996(5)SCALE233; (1996)5SCC216; [1996]Supp3SCR677

Advocate for Appellant : Party-in-Perso

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J. 1. In a clash of competing interests in constitutional contours, this case calls to strike a balance between the freedom of speech and expression, a salutary right in a liberal democratic society and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2014

Rajeev Dhawan Vs. Gulshan Kumar Mahajan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2014

Subject : Contempt of Court

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) No.2 OF1994Rajeev Dhawan …… Petitioner Vs. Gulshan Kumar Mahajan & Ors. …… Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CRL.) No.4A OF1994JUDGMENT R.M. LODHA, CJI. As...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2005

Andhra Bank Vs. Official Liquidator and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2005

Subject : CompanyBanking

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 18, 19(2), 19(7), 19(19), 19(22), 442, 446, 446(1), 446(2), 446(3), 529, 529(1), 529(2), 529(3), 529A, 529A(1), 530 and 537; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2005SC1814; II(2005)BC425(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN1; [2005]124CompCas453(SC); (2005)4CompLJ33(SC); JT2005(3)SC506; (2005)3MLJ19(SC); (2005)5SCC75; [2005]59SCL239(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : L. Nageswar Rao, Sr. Adv.,; V. Sheshagiri,; M. Rajshekhar

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Doubting the correctness of the statement of law contained in paragraph 76 of the judgment of this Court in Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank and Anr. : [2000]2SCR1102 , a Division Bench of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1998

Jaswant Rai and Another Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Revenue ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-04-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1960 - Sections 271(4A) and 271(1); Constitution of India - Article 226; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1975

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)41; AIR1998SC1891; [1998]231ITR745(SC); JT1998(3)SC690; RLW1998(2)SC328; 1998(3)SCALE406; (1998)5SCC77; [1998]3SCR139

S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. The appellants before us preferred a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Delhi seeking for a direction to extend the benefit of waiver...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2000

Sashi Kanta Ruia Vs. M/S. Indo Minerals and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-01-2000

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2000SC2745; 2000(II)OLR(SC)442; RLW2001(1)SC112; 2000(5)SCALE384; (2000)6SCC604

ORDERG.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Both these appeals are directed against a common judgment of a learned Single Judge of Calcutta High Court, disposing of the two Second Appeals namely Second Appeal No. 331 of 1997 and Second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1998

State of West Bengal and Others Vs. NuruddIn Mallik and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-18-1998

Subject : Media and CommunicationService

Reported in : AIR1999SC1466; JT1998(6)SC451; 1998(5)SCALE327; (1998)8SCC143

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Sen

ORDERMisra, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the judgments and orders dated 9th February, 1994 and 29th August 1995 by which the High Court directed the appellant-authorities to grant approval to the teaching and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial