Advanced Search Results
Manas Sarkar and ors. Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-08-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR2000Cal251
Dipankar Ghosh as Amicus Curiae, ;Saktinath Mukherjee, ;Ajit Kumar Panja, ;Prodosh Kumar Mallick, ;S.K. Kapoor, ;Nirmalendu Nath Mitra, ;Sibdas Banerjee, ;Adhip Chandra Kar, ;Pratap Chatterjee, ;Subra
ORDERAmitava Lala, J.1. There are 5 writ petitions altogether. All the 5 writ petitions are meant for the purpose of granting relief in favour of the petitioners in the nature of regularisation of their candidature as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs Vs. Mitsuny Electronic Works
Kolkata
Jun-13-1984
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Section 108; ;Imports (Control) Order, 1955; ;Constitution of India - Article 134A
1989(24)ECC312,1987(30)ELT345(Cal)
Dipankar Ghosh, ;J.N. Ghosh and ;S.K. Chatterjee, Advs.
Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. These three applications have been moved by the Customs Authorities for stay of the operation of the ex parte interim Orders dated 7th March, 1984 passed by A.K. Janah, 3. in three...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChatter Singh Baid and ors. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta and ors.
Kolkata
Jun-01-1983
Civil
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 181, 182, 182(2), 183(1), 183(3A), 191, 207 and 207(2); ;Constitution of India - Article 14
AIR1984Cal283,1983(2)CHN330,(1983)2CompLJ205(Cal),88CWN89
Dipankar Ghosh, ;P.K. Mallick, ;Sudipto Sarkar and ;O.P. Jhunjhunwala, Advs.
ORDERChittatosh Mookerjee, J.1. The petitioners are owners of Premises No. 11, Indra Kumar Karnani Street (formerly known as Premises No. 11, Jackson Lane), with effect from 4th quarter, 1978-79 the Corporation of Calcutta had determined the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Md. Rashid Khan Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Apr-13-1994
Criminal
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 1(2), 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(2)(15), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), 3(6), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(3), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 8, 9, 11, 11(1), 14, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 20(8), 20A(2), 21, 21(1), 21(2) and 22; ;Explosives Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 5 and 6; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302, 307, 326 and 436; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; ;Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) (Amendment) Act, 1993 - Sections 3 and 4; ;Customs Act - Section 137; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 14, 132, 161, 164, 169, 170, 173(2), 190, 197, 207(1), 397(2), 397(3) and 439; ;Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971; ;General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3(2); ;West Bengal (Prevention of Violent A
1994CriLJ2699
Dipankar Ghosh and ;Tapan Deb Nandi, Advs.;Soumen Bose, ;S.K. Kundu and ;Anjan Mukherjee, Advs.
ORDERShyamal Kumar Sen, J.1. In the instant writ petition the petitioner has challenged the validity and propriety of the cognizance taken by the Designated Court constituted Under Section 9 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Corporation of Calcutta Vs. Murari Churn Law
Kolkata
Sep-03-1975
CivilLimitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 9; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5
AIR1976Cal299
Dipankar Ghosh, Adv.
Masud, J.1. In this application under Order 22, Rule 9 read with Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner-appellant, Corporation of Calcutta, has prayed for setting aside the abatement of the present appeal....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGour Gopal Dutt and ors. Vs. Sm. Shantilata Mitra and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-05-1975
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 2
AIR1976Cal475
Dipankar Ghosh and ;Mallick, Advs.
ORDERAjay K. Basu, J.1. This is an application for contempt of Court moved by the petitioner against the respondents for deliberately violating or flouting the solemn undertaking given to this Hon'ble Court by the respondents before...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Rukmini Devi Todi and anr. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.
Kolkata
Mar-03-2000
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 and 446(2);; Indian Easement Act, 1882;; Transfer of Property Act, 1882;; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960;; Trust Act, 1882
(2000)3CALLT158(HC)
Mr. Dipankar Ghosh, ;Mr. S.K. Kapoor,; Mr. Arindam Singh, ;Mr. Jayanta Kumar Mitra, ;Mr. Soumitra Sen and ;Mr. Joujit Ganguly, Advs.
P. K. Sen, J.1. This appeal is at the instance of two respondents in a winding up proceeding and is directed against an order of a Company Judge by which the learned Company Judge allowed a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Chandana Bose Vs. Saturday Club Limited and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-11-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 40; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4 and 65; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 41
(2003)3CALLT73(HC)
Dipankar Ghosh and ;S.K. Kapoor, Advs.
Pinaki Chandra Ghosh, J. 1. The petitioner has filed a suit in this Hon'ble Court. This application has been filed in the said suit. In the said suit the petitioner has filed this application inter alia...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAcharya Jagadishwaranada Avadhuta and Another Vs. Commissioner of Poli ...
Kolkata
May-07-1990
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 25, 25(1), 26 and 32;; Arms Act, 1959 - Section 2;; Arms (Amendment) Act, 1972 - Section 2;; Calcutta Police Act, 1866 - Section 62A;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 144;; The Indian Arms Act, 1878
AIR1990Cal336,(1990)2CALLT212(HC)
Dipankar Ghosh, ;Ashoke Ganguly, ;Pradip Tarafdar and ;Amresh Bag, Advs.
ORDER1. This writ application was moved by the petitioner who is the General Secretary, Public Relations Department of the Ananda Margy Pracharak Sangha and the Ananda Margo Pracharak Sangha, a religious organisation propounded by Sri Ananda...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammadbhai Sk. Mohsinbhoy and ors. Vs. Trustees for the Improvement ...
Kolkata
Aug-04-1983
PropertyContract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10
AIR1984Cal219
Dipankar Ghosh and ;Pratap Chatterjee, Advs.
ORDERMonjula Bose, J.1. The petitioner herein seeks to be added as a party-defendant to the proceedings by reason of the fact that during the pendency of the present suit an agreement for sale of the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »