Advanced Search Results

Hirendra Nath Bakshi Vs. Ram Jauhar and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1973Cal48

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghose, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Hazra, J.1. This is an interlocutory application for injunction restraining the respondent No. 2, Life Insurance Corporation of India (hereinatfer called the L. I. C.) and its servants, agents, representatives, assigns, employees or otherwise from...

Ratan Kumar Poddar and ors. Vs. the Howrah Motor Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 38, Rule 5; ;Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1975Cal180

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghose, Adv.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. The first respondent Howrah Motor Co. Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company) is a distributor in the eastern region of India of several well-known concerns manufacturing motor spare-parts and components. According...

The Rajputana Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Malay Trading Agency

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 133(1); ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Reported in : AIR1974Cal152,(1973)77CALLT635(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghose, ;S.K. Kapoor and ;P.K. Roy, Advs.

B.C. Mitra, J. 1. This is an application for a certificate under Article 133(1)(b) of the Constitution for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The application out of which this present application for leave to...

Saidun Nessa Hoque and ors. Vs. Calcutta Vyapar Pratisthan Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 55 and 55(6)

Reported in : AIR1978Cal285

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghose, Adv.

Ramenbra Mohan Datta, J. 1. The appeal herein has since been dismissed with costs for default of appearance of the appellant on or about 8th Sept. 1977 in the presence of the respondent. The respondent intending...

Jaharlal Paul Vs. Ananda Chandra Paul and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR1981Cal424

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghose, Adv.

ORDERDipak Kumar Sen, J.1. The property which isthe subject-matter of the suit is premises No. 203/4. Bidhan Sarani, Calcutta (hereinafter referred to as the said premises). Bv an award made in an arbitration on the 12th...

Calcutta Metropolitan Development Authority Vs. S.K. Bose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1661

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dipankar Ghose

Monoj Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment and, order dated May 24, 1982 passed by a learned Judge of this Court in Civil Rule No. 15161 (W) of 1981, whereby the...

Bengal Electric Lamp Works Ltd. Vs. Sukdev Chandra Sinha

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Section 13 and 13(1); ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106 and 111

Reported in : AIR1983Cal389

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghosh, ;Bhabesh C. Ghose Roy, ;R.M. Chatterjee and ;Sharada Parmar, Advs.

C.K. Banerji, J.1. This ig an appeal from the judgment and decree dated 11th May. 1981 passed by Shri S. N. Banerjee, Judge. XIII Bench of the City Civil Court at Calcutta in the ejectment suit...

Orient Longman Ltd. Vs. Jayati Laila Kabir and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 160

Reported in : AIR1988Cal410

Advocate for Appellant : Reddy, ;Sudipta Sarkar, ;Suchit Banerjee and ;S.K. Ash, Advs.

Monoj Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated February 24, 1988 passed by a learned Judge of this Court disposing of a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of...

Gour Gopal Dutt and ors. Vs. Sm. Shantilata Mitra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Section 2

Reported in : AIR1976Cal475

Advocate for Appellant : Dipankar Ghosh and ;Mallick, Advs.

ORDERAjay K. Basu, J.1. This is an application for contempt of Court moved by the petitioner against the respondents for deliberately violating or flouting the solemn undertaking given to this Hon'ble Court by the respondents before...

Mackinnon Mackenzie and Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar Sen and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 2 and 3; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6 - Order 12, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rule 46C

Reported in : AIR1975Cal150,78CWN860

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Bachawat, Adv.

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This appeal is directed against an order dated February 20, 1974, whereby the appellant was directed to pay to the Sheriff of Calcutta a sum of Rs. 1,40,873.15 attached in its hands by...