Advanced Search Results
Technique Diabrasives India Ltd. Vs. Uoi
Rajasthan
Mar-05-2003
Direct Taxation
[2004]134TAXMAN69(Raj)
Dinesh Mehta, for the Assessee Sandeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue
N.N. Mathur, J. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition in limine against the show-cause notice relegating the appellant to the statutory remedy.2. A notice was issued to the appellant assessee-company for the assessment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMutha Premraj Vs. Asstt. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.
Rajasthan
Apr-11-2002
Sales Tax
Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 22A(7)
RLW2003(3)Raj1428; 2002(5)WLN203
Dinesh Mehta, Adv.
Chauhan, J.1. The first revision petition has been filed under Sec. 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 against the judgment and order of the Rajasthan Tax Board (for short, 'the Board') dated 1.11.2000 (Annx.7),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMool Singh Vs. Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-04-2002
Sales Tax
Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 79(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
[2004]138STC671(Raj)
Dinesh Mehta Adv.
1. The instant writ petition Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to quash the order dated October 26, 1998 passed by Rajasthan Taxation Tribunal, Jodhpur* (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kalani Industries Pvt. Ltd Vs. State of Raj. and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Aug-06-2013
Land Acquisition
Mr. Dinesh Mehta
S.B.C.W.P. No.5944/2009 Kalani Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:06. 08/2013 1/23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5944/2009 Kalani Industries (P) Ltd....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Kumar Srivastava Vs. R.P.S.C. and anr.
Rajasthan
Mar-03-2003
Constitution
2003(3)WLC51; 2003(3)WLN65
Mr. Dinesh Mehta
N.N. Mathur, J.1. Heard Mr. Dinesh Mehta learned counsel for the appellant and perused the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 29.1.2002 dismissing the writ petition on the ground of delay.2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMumal Marbles Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Oct-30-2002
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Article 226; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954
[2003]130STC160(Raj); 2003(1)WLC665; 2003(2)WLN523
Dinesh Mehta, Adv.
N.N. Mathur, J.1. These three special appeals are directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge relegating the petitioner to alternate remedy under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act.2. The petitioner-company is carrying on the business...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Raj Clay Products Vs. Ashok Sampat Ram and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
Sep-03-2013
Land Acquisition
Shri. Dinesh Mehta
(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.473/2011 M/s. Raj Clay Products Vs. Shri Ashok Sampat Ram & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :03. 9.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamal Singh Vs. Raj. Tax Board, Ajmer and ors
Rajasthan Jodhpur
May-20-2014
Land Acquisition
Shri. Dinesh Mehta
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2479/2014 (Kamal Singh v. Rajasthan Tax Board & Ors.) Date of Order :: 20th May, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr.Dinesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSumerpur Truck Operators Union Vs. Ito
Rajasthan
Jul-02-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)176CTR(Raj)297
Dinesh Mehta, for the Assessee
By the CourtThis appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order of the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench dated 22-2-2002. The appellant has framed as many as 9 substantial questions of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeneral Insurance Employees Association Vs. Union of India and ors.
Rajasthan
Mar-09-1998
Direct Taxation
(2000)160CTR(Raj)327
Income Tax Act, 1961, s. 10(14) counsel appeared N.M. Lodha, for the Petitioner Sandeep Bhandawat, for the Respondent No. 1 D, R. Loonkar, for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 Dinesh Mehta,
ORDERR.R. Yadav, J.:Heard2. Perused the averments made in the writ petition as well as reply filed on behalf of the answering respondents.3. From the perusal of the decision rendered by a Division Bench of Bombay High...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »