Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dinesh mathur · Page 1 of about 113 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 10 1977

Gapal Dass Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-10-1977

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 386, 397, 427(1) and 482

Reported in : AIR1978Delhi138

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur, amices Curia

Prithvi Raj, J. 1. These six petitions, Cr. Misc. (Main) Nos. 122 of 1977. 69 of 1977, 169 of 1977, 145 of 1977, 136 of 1977 and 174 of 1977, have been referred by a learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2002

Jai Bhagwan Vs. the State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-09-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT170

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur, Sr. Adv. and; Rebecca M. John, Adv

Dalveer Bhandari, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and sentence dated 7.8.1993 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No. 56/91. Appellant Jai Bhagwan was tried along...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2006

Anurag Singh Vs. the State (Through Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 20, 21, 25 and 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - 173(8); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 201, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ777

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur, Sr Adv.,; Ramesh Gupta,; Rebcca M. John,;

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. On 27.03.2006, when this matter was taken up for hearing, my learned predecessor had indicated in the order the broad arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties. It was noted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 1995

Ram Lal Narang Vs. the State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)656; 1995(34)DRJ151

Advocate for Appellant : D.C. Mathur,; Harjinder Singh,; Paramjit Benipal and;

Vijender Jain, J. (1) This appeal is filed by the appellant for setting aside the order of conviction and sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. (2) Briefly the facts of the case are that two...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2007

Shibu Soren Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 8 and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 302 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 313

Reported in : 2007(95)DRJ545

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur, Sr. Adv.,; Barun K. Sinha,; Sanjiv Kumar

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Vide judgment dated 28th November, 2006 and order of sentence dated 5th December, 2006, appellant Shibu Soren had been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 120B read with Section 364/302 IPC. He...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1996

Sukhwant Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-20-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 98; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)77; 1996CriLJ4079; 1996(38)DRJ299

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur,; R.M. Tiwari and; Dalip Singh, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) This petitioner was charged with three offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1988'). The first charge against him is that he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1996

Kalawati Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-01-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1997(40)DRJ101

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur,; Neelam Grover and; R.D. Jolly, Advs

S.K. Mahajan, J. (1) By this order, I propose to dispose of the revision against the order dated 22nd March, 1996 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge had framed charges against the petitioner under Sections 302/201/120B...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Eskay Electronics (i) Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. P.K. Khera, Superintenden ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : CriminalExcise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 9, 9A and 32K(1); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 56; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(2); Criminal Procedure , 1973 - Sections 244 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 120B, 161, 192, 193 and 120; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : 2009(244)ELT519(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur, Sr. Adv.,; D.K. Mathur, Adv. in Crl. M.C. 1832/2008 and;

Rajiv Shakdher, J.1. The captioned petitions, which are filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to in short the Cr.P.C.), can be disposed of by a common judgment in view...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1996

Dr. V.J.A. Flynn Vs. S.S. Chauhan and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1996

Subject : Customs

Acts : Antiquities Act, 1947 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3080; 1996(37)DRJ195; ILR1998Delhi426

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur and; C.N. Sree Kumar, Advs

ORDER1. The petitioner Dr. V. J. A. Flynn is stated to be the second accused in a complaint case filed by the Custom Officer. He has sought the quashing of the said complaint case No. 91/1/94...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

P. Das Gupta Vs. State (Thru C.B.i.)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438 and 482

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1055; 101(2002)DLT193; 2003(66)DRJ129

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Mathur, Sr. Adv.,; A.K. Sengupta,; M.K. Mandal a

ORDERJ.D. Kapoor, J.1. The apprehension of the petitioner is that the moment he will appear in the court of learned Special Judge, he will be taken into custody as the learned Special Judge as a matter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial