Advanced Search Results

Rakesh Kumar Joshi Vs. Narendra Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 12, 12(3), 16, 21 and 21(1); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16, 16(2) and 16(3)

Reported in : 2008(1)AWC1019(SC); 2008(1)SCALE647

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Kumar Garg,; B.S. Billowria,; Abhishek Garg and;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 30.11.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 27141...

Dinesh Kumar and 2 ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN685

Narendra Mohan Kasliwal, J.1. In all these three writ petitions the validity of Rule 2(A) of the Rules of Admission in Medical Colleges in Rajasthan, 1985 has been challenged. The case of the petitioners is that...

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionService

Permod Kohli, J.I. General1. District Judiciary is the foundation of the judicial system upon which the whole edifice of the judicial institutions stands. Judiciary is the bulwark of the democratic system in India and reckons indubitably...

Kirta Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1438

ORDERH.R. Panwar, J.1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482, Cr. P.C. is directed against the order dt. 7-3-2006 passed by Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Chittorgarh (for short the trial Court') hereinafter, whereby an application filed...

Afhq/isos Sos (Dp) Association and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Services Rules, 1968 - Rules 2, 10, 11.1, 13, 14, 16, 16(1), 16(5), 16(6), 16(7), 16.5, 16.6 and 16.7; Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) (Class I) Rules, 1976 - Rules 18 and 21; Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Recruitment) Regulations, 1966 - Regulations 30, 34 and 34(6); Andhra Pradesh SRTC Employees (Service) Regulations, 1964 - Regulation 3; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : JT2008(2)SC508; (2008)3MLJ97(SC); 2008(2)SCALE642; (2008)3SCC331; 2008AIRSCW1867; 2008(2)Supreme229

Advocate for Appellant : Paramjit Singh Patwalia and; Rakesh Khanna, Sr. Advs.,; Kiran

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. The usual question as regards determination of inter se seniority between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) once again falls for consideration in these two appeals by special leave,...

Nani Sha and ors. Vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Arunachal Pradesh Forest Rules; Arunachal Pradesh Forest Service Rules - Rules 5, 17 and 25; Uttar Pradesh Agriculture Group B Service Rules, 1995 - Rules 17 and 21; Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991 - Rule 8

Reported in : [2007(114)FLR841]; 2007(7)SCALE521; 2007AIRSCW4174; AIR2007SC2356; JT2007(7)SC284

Advocate for Appellant : C.M. Nayar, Sr. Adv.,; R.K. Singh and; C.D. Singh, Advs

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is a classic example of the internal fight between the direct employees and the promoted employees in the matter of inter-se seniority. 3. The appeal has been filed by...

Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. and ors. Vs. Shiva Kant Jha @ ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 12

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR534

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Mazumdar and; J.K. Mazumdar, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5.8.2003 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1704 of 2000 (R) whereby learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition and quashed the impugned order as...

Jagjeet Rana Vs. Sanjay Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Kumar Garg

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.411 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.246 OF2011IN AVISHEK RAJA & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SANJAY GUPTA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.33 OF2015IN WP...

Venkatesh @ Tiger Venkatesh @ English Venkatesh Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84, 304, 307 and 341

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1112; ILR2005KAR538; 2005(1)KarLJ612

Advocate for Appellant : Dinesh Kumar K. Rao, Amicus Curiae

N.S. Veerabhadraiah, J.1. This appeal is by the appellant - accused assailing the judgment of conviction dated 18.11.98 for the offence under Sections 307 and 341 I.P.C. in S.C. No. 93/93 rendered by the I Additional...

The State of Karnataka, Rep. by Its Chief Secretary Vs. A.R. Infant I. ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: S. Vijay Shankar, Advocate General along with Smt. Revathi Adinath Narde, HCGP. For Respondents: R1 - Navkesh Batra for Nandi, Law Chambers, R2 - M.V. Rao, P.S. Rajagopal, Sr. Counsel, R3 - M.N. Prasanna, R4 - P.S. Dinesh Kumar, Advoca

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned order dated 16.3.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore in Original Application No.545/11...