Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dilip sen · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 12 1996

Milan Sen Vs. Guardian Plasticote Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-12-1996

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 81

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas105(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Mukherjee, Adv.

Baboo Lall Jain, J. 1. The petitioners instituted this suit, inter alia, for the following reliefs : '(a) Declaration that resolution to issue new shares in defendant No. 1 passed in the meeting of the board...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1970

Union Drug Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-28-1970

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 10(2)

Reported in : [1974]93ITR91(Cal)

Arun K. Mukherjea, J.1. This reference arises out of the following facts and circumstances. The assessee is a company manufacturing, among other things, medicines. Before May, 1959, the assessee used also to manufacture serum. The assessee...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 1989

United Bank of India Vs. Rashyan Udyog and Others, Etc.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-12-1989

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 34 and 107 - Order 34, Rule 11;; Bihar Money-Lenders (Regulation of Transaction) Act, 1939 - Section 8;; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 36, 37, 38 and 39A

Reported in : AIR1990Cal146,[1992]73CompCas482(Cal),93CWN1130

Advocate for Appellant : Chandra Nath Mukherjee and ;Dilip Sen, Advs.

ORDERA.M. Bhattacharjee, J. 1. Theonly question involved in these two appeals at the instance of the decree-holder Bank is whether the trial Court was wrong in not granting the pendente lite and also post-decree interest, while...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 08 1996

Bimal Adak and ors. Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 437, 438 and 439

Reported in : (1997)1CALLT94(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Safiullah, Public Prosecutor;Dilip Sen and ;D.K. Banerjee, Advs. in Crl Misc. No. 690 of 1996 and ;B.K. Mukherjee, ;J.K. Dutta and ;S. Sen, Advs. in Crl Misc. No. 612 of 1996

Rabin Bhattacharyya, J. 1. The point came to be debated at the bar is whether the submission of charge-sheet of a non-bailable offence entails forfeiture of right to anticipatory bail. The rival contention is that, that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1996

Bimaladak and ors. Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-08-1996

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433, 437, 438, 438(1), 439 and 498; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 379

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1969

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Sen, ;D.K. Banerjee, Advs. in Crl. Misc. 690 of 1996 and ;B.K. Mukhetjee, ;J.K. Dutta and ;S. Sen, Advs. in Crl. Misc. 612 of 1996

R. Bhattacharyya, J.1. The point came to be debated at the bar is whether the submission of charge-sheet of a non-bailable offence entails forfeiture of right to anticipatory bail. The rival contention is that, that submission...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 1973

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Trustees to the Trust Estate of Tarun K ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-01-1973

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 41

Reported in : [1974]94ITR361(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Sen and ;Ajit Kumar Sengupta, Advs.

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. In this reference under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the following question has been referred to this court:' Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Dilip Sen Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-12-2015

Subject : MRTP

10 Cr. M. P. No. 786 of 2005 Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Dilip Sen Gupta, son of Sri S. N. Sen Gupta, resident of Telco Colony (Kharkai Road), P.O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Dilip Kumar Sen Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-12-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

6 Cr. M. P. No. 788 of 2005 Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Dilip Sen Gupta, son of Sri S. N. Sen Gupta, resident of Telco Colony (Kharkai Road), P.O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 1981

Brojendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. Mrs. Arpana Ghosh and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-23-1981

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Section 10

Reported in : AIR1982Cal360,(1982)2CompLJ132(Cal)

Sudhindra Mohan Guha, J. 1. The instant reference has been made by Sri A. K. Chatterjee, District Judge, Burdwan for confirmation of the decree passed in Matrimonial Suit No. 70 of 1976 under the Indian Divorce...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1985

Kalyan Sen Vs. Gift-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-19-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 13(2), 16, 35 and 35(1); ;Income Tax Act; ;Wealth-tax Act

Reported in : [1987]164ITR565(Cal)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Murarka and ;Jaydeb Ch. Saha, Advs.

Suhas Chandra Sen, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the initiation of criminal proceedings against the petitioner under Section 35(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act.2. In or about 1959, the petitioner and his brother and some other members...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial