Advanced Search Results

Om Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 177 and 220; Inidan Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 215, 420, 467, 468 and 511; Constitution of India (Fifteenth Amendment - 1963, Forty Second Amendment - 1976) - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4385

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta and ;Dilip Kumar, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J1. This writ petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred with unusual prayers that the proceedings in complaint cases Nos. 627 of 2000, 42 of 2001, 36 of 2001...

N.Tamilvanan. Vs. the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act - Section 81; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Adv.

PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 30.06.2008 passed in W.P.(MD)No.5769 of 2008 on the file of this Court.JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.M.AKABAR ALI, J.)1....

Ranjeet Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cattle Trespass Act - Sections 20; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19(3) and 30(2); Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 - Sections 7; Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984 - Sections 56(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 6, 50, 57, 87, 154, 156, 156(3) 157, 165, 167, 167(6), 173, 173(2)(1), 173(8), 190, 190(1), 193, 195 to 100, 202, 203, 204, 204(1), 204(5), 206, 209, 211 to 214, 239, 240, 244, 245, 245(1), 245(2), 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 258, 260, 290, 301, 301(2), 302, 302(2), 303, 317, 317(2), 319, 319(1), 397, 397(2), 467 to 473 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 151, 307, 324, 328, 395, 397, 406, 420, 427, 436, 448, 452, 498A, 500, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 22(1) and 226; Crimina

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)291; 2000CriLJ2738

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dhama, ;Dilip Kumar, ;Tejpal, ;A.M. Zaidi and ;Kamal Krishna, Advs.

Palok Basu, J.1. The substantial issue in the instant six matters is whether a Magistrate/Court before rejecting a 'Final-Report' filed by an Investigating Officer, has to hear the accused on his appearing voluntarily or after notice...

Dilip Kumar and anr. Vs. Board of Revenue and 2 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1981WLN516

1. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, Dilip Kumar and Jugal Kishore, have challenged the validity of the order, dated June 23, 1978, Ex, 9, passed by the...

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal on Behal ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 251A, 251A(7), 251A(11), 252(2), 526, 526(8) and 540; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1932; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1968Cal512,1968CriLJ1396

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Kumar Dutta, Adv.

N.C. Talukdar, J.1. This is an appeal by the Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs West Bengal, on behalf of the State of West Bengal against an order dated the 24th April, 1967 passed by Shri...

C.Thangappan. Vs. Dr.R.S.Lalmohan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure,(CPC) 1908 - Section 115, 80, Order 47, Rules 1, 2; Tamil Nadu Protection of Tanks and Eviction of Encroachment Act, 2007 - Section 2(l)(m, Rule 6, 4(3))(g)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, Adv

Review filed under Order 47, Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order of this Court dated 28.02.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.1205 of 2012.ORDERR.BANUMATHI, J1. Review Petitioner seeks to...

Ranadhir Basu Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 20, 34, 109, 120B, 301, 302, 302, 302, 327(1) and 376;; Evidence Act, 1862 - Sections 3, 60, 114 and 133;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164, 209, 306, 306(1, 4 and 5), 307 and 327

Reported in : (1999)1CALLT179(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Datta, ;Mr. Arup C. Chatterjee, ;Mr. Gautam Sarkar, ;Ms. Debjani Sengupta and ;Mr. Kallol Kumar Maity, Advs.

B.M. Mitra, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against a Judgment of conviction against accused appellant No. 1, namely, Ranadhir Basu, under sections 301, 302/120B and 201 of in dian Penal Code and for the offence...

Sunil Kumar Ghosh Vs. Ajit Kumar Das and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 340, 350, 423 and 439; ;Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 226

Reported in : AIR1969Cal492,1969CriLJ1234,73CWN212

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Kumar Dutta, Adv.

ORDERN.C. Talukdar, J. 1. This Rule is at the instance of the de facto complainant and is against an order dated the 31st May 1960 passed by Shri S.L. Roy, Magistrate, First Class, Howrah, acquitting the...

West Bengal Board of Secondary Education and anr., Vs. Siliguri Hindi ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4), 25, 26, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); ;Evidence Act - Section 114; ;Societies Registration Act

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN571

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Bhunia, ;A.K. Roy, ;M. Bhattacharjee, ;Dilip Kumar Samanta, ;Mala Dutta and ;Kollol Basu, Advs.

D. K. Seth, J.1. These three appeals by consent of the parties were taken up together for hearing in view of the fact that these appeals arise out of the one and the same judgment passed...

C.Janardhana Rao Vs. the General Manager, South Central Railway, Rail ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Applicant : R. Dilip Kumar. Counsel for the Respondents : N.R. Devaraj, SC for Rlys. K.S.Murthy for R-4.

ORAL ORDER : { As per Hon'ble Mrs. Bharati Ray, Member (Judl.) } Heard Mr.R.Dilip Kumar, the learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr.N.R.Devaraj, the learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. This application has been...