Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dilip dutt and · Page 1 of about 12 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 14 2004

Rajinder Singh @ Manu and Bijoy Singh Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-14-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B and 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 207, 304 and 313; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 137 and 146; ;Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : 2004(3)CHN99,2004CriLJ4023

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutt, ;Jyotirmoy Adhikari, ;Anasuya Sinha, ;D. Mitra and ;Avishek Sinha, Advs. in Cr. A. No. 333 of 2002, ;Sekhar Basu, ;D. Roy, ;Kallol Mondal and ;Firoj Edulji, Advs. in Cr. A. No. 348 of 2002

Arun Kumar Bhattacharya, J. 1. The hearing stems from 14 sets of appeals preferred by 19 convicts against the judgment and order of their conviction and sentence passed on 31.08.2002 by Mr. Intaj Ali Shah, ld....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1985

Parimal Banerjee Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-03-1985

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1986CriLJ220

N.G. Chaudhuri, J.1. Parimal Banerjee, hereinafter to be referred to simply as Parimal for the sake of brevity, has come up in appeal aggrieved with the judgment, of conviction and sentence rendered against him by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1993

Smt. Minati Das Vs. Radhakanta Patra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-12-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 173, 173(5), 231, 232, 226, 309(2) and 319; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3 and 73

Reported in : (1994)2CALLT432(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutta and ; Arup Chatterjee, Advs.

Gitesh Ranjan Bhattacharjee, J.1. In this criminal revision the question that has fallen for consideration is whether any interference with the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 4th Court, Midnapur refusing to add the opposite...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 1964

Gour Chandra Garai Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-04-1964

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 - Sections 17, 112, 115, 116 and 131; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Section 238

Reported in : AIR1965Cal363,1965CriLJ84

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip K. Dutta, Adv.

ORDERAmaresh Roy, J.1. In this case upon an application for Revision of an order of conviction and sentence of fine imposed upon the petitioner, a Rule was issued to show cause why that order of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1984

Parmal Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-27-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ1302

N.G. Chaudhuri, J.1. Six accused-respondents herein faced a Sessions trial on charges under Sections 148, 302/149, 302/34 and 323/34 I.P.C. The allegations made against them were that while Parimal Ghosh, Krishna Ghosh, Biren Pramanick, Gopinath Ghosh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2003

Shamim Ahmed and ors., Vs. State and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-04-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70, 70(2), 190(1), 200, 203, 204, 209, 436, 437, 437(3), 438, 438(1), 438(2) and 438(3)

Reported in : (2003)2CALLT11(HC),2003(2)CHN431,2003CriLJ2815

Advocate for Appellant : Milan Mukherjee and ;Sandipan Ganguly, Advs. in C.R.M. No. 3541 of 2000, ;Dilip Dutt, ;Narayan Ch. Das and ;D. Satrudhar, Advs. in C.R.M. No. 1739 of 2001, ;Dilip Dutt and ;Soubhik Mitra, Advs. in C.R

G.C. De, J. 1. This Special Bench has been constituted to answer the following common questions raised in all these pending applications: 'Whether an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 2002

State of West Bengal Vs. Nilkantha Mahato and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Oct-10-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 148, 149, 300, 323 and 324

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3566

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutt and ;Arup C. Chatterjee, Advs.

Malay Kumar Basu, J.1. Both these appeals having arisen out of the same judgment and they involving common questions of law and fact, will be governed by this single judgment.2. Both these appeals are directed against...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 1991

Jogendra Nath Sen and Another Vs. State of Another

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-16-1991

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Ac, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 17, 18(1) and (2), 19, 22, 51 and 63

Reported in : AIR1991Cal308

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutt and ;P.K. Ghosh, Advs.

ORDERA. M. Bhattacharjee, J. 1. Notwithstanding my appreciation of and concurring in the judgment of my learned brother Ray, J., appearing hereinafter, I have thought it advisable to add a few words for more reasons than...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2002

Debabrata Mondal and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 49, 148, 149, 302, 304, 326 and 448; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 58, 137, 138 and 145; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 162, 174, 294 and 294(3)

Reported in : (2003)1CALLT16(HC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sekhar Kr. Basu, ;Debabrata Banerjee, Satyabrata Chakraborty and ;Sandip Ganguly, Advs. for Appellant Nos. 1 to 5 and 8 to 10 and ;Dilip Dutt and ;Arup Chatterjee, Advs. for Appellant Nos. 6 to 7

S. Barman Roy, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.9.1997 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 13th Court, Alipore, South 24-parganas convicting eleven appellants, namely, Debabrata Mondol, Manabendra Mondol, Khakan Naskar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1993

Dinabandhu Banerjee Vs. Nandini Mukherjee

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-15-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Section 27; ;Mines Act - Section 66; ;Mines Regulations - Regulation 3; ;Employees' Provident Fund and Family Pension Act, 1952; ;Companies Act - Section 630; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 468, 469, 472 and 473; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 403, 405 and 406

Reported in : 1994CriLJ422

Advocate for Appellant : Dilip Dutt, ;Biman Kanti Basu, ;Giti Das, ;Kavita Mukherjee and ;Madhuri Das, Advs.

ORDERGitesh Ranjan Bhattacharjee, J.1. This revisional application has been made for quashing the proceeding, being No. 1565C/92 (T.R. No. 215/92, T.R. No. 86/92) pending in the 3rd Court of, Judicial Magistrate, Howrah. The said proceeding was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial