Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: dhruv mehta · Page 1 of about 433 results (0.093 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 21 2009

M.N. Ojha and ors. Vs. Alok Kumar Srivastav and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-21-2009

Subject : CriminalBanking

Acts : Public Demand Recovery Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 422 and 426; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : AIR2010SC201; 2009CriLJ4642; JT2009(10)SC590; 2009(11)SCALE573; (2009)9SCC682:2009AIRSCW5848

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta,; Yashraj Singh Deora,; Mohit Abraham, Advs.

B. Sudershan Reddy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by grant of special leave is directed by the appellant, assailing the judgment and order dated 3.1.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2000

Smt. G. Kaushalya Devi Vs. Ghanshyamdas

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2000

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 - Sections 10(3) and 22; Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Act, 1951 - Sections 8(3)

Reported in : AIR2000SC656; JT2000(1)SC127; (2000)IIMLJ104(SC); 2000(1)SCALE131; (2000)2SCC1; [2000]1SCR193

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta,; Shobha,; Srinivas Rao and;

D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant is a tenant. His eviction from suit premises has been affirmed by the High Court in revision filed by him. Feeling aggrieved, he has filed this appeal.3. Respondent-landlord filed eviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1997

Kashinath S. Bandekar and ors. Vs. Atmaram Vassudeva Naique and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Portuguese Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Articles 515 and 516

Reported in : JT1997(3)SC651; 1997(3)SCALE31; (1997)9SCC279; [1997]2SCR1075

A.S. Anand, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature Bombay (Panaji Bench, Goa) dated 5th of July 1990.2. The case has a chequered history...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 02 2002

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporati ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-02-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 328, 328(3), 328A and 471

Reported in : AIR2002SC1638; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)932; 2002(5)BomCR121; (2002)3BOMLR596; JT2002(3)SC452; 2002(3)SCALE231; (2002)4SCC219; [2002]2SCR860; 2002(1)LC681(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Pallav Shishodia and; D.N. Mishra, Advs. for JBD & Co

Raju, J.1. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay who lost before the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court, is the appellant herein against the judgment dated 30.8.85 in Appeal No.167 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2001

Biswanath Poddar Vs. Archana Poddar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-25-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2) and 16(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 21, Rules 99, 100 and 101; Evidence Act - Sections 91 and 92; West Bengal Premises Tenancy Rules - Rule 4

Reported in : AIR2001SC2849; JT2001(8)SC121; 2001(6)SCALE461; (2001)8SCC187

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; H.K. Puri,; S.K. Puri,;

Santosh Hegde, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant herein who is the owner of one room in ground floor of premises No.42-A, Shakespeare Sarani, P.S. Park Street, Calcutta, had let out the said premises to Smt. Archana...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2009

Rajasthan GramIn Bank Vs. Bishan Lal Bairwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ235SC

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal by the Management is to an order, dated 2nd August, 2007, passed by an Appellate Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in CSA (W)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2008

The State of West Bengal and ors. Vs. Kamal Sengupta and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-16-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 4, 21, 22 and 22(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14; Constitution of India (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 46; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 114, 206 and 623 - Order 47, Rule 1; West Bengal (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1981; West Bengal (Revision of Pay and Allowance) Rules, 1990 - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 226, 309, 323A and 323B

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3764(SC); 2008(56)BLJR2317; (2009)1CALLT21(SC); JT2008(8)SC317; 2008(3)SLJ209(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Bhaskar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv.,; Jaideep Kar,; Rana Mukherjee

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether a Tribunal established under Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunals Act (for short `the Act') can review its decision on the basis of subsequent order/decision/judgment rendered by a coordinate or larger bench...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2007

Builders Association of India and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996 - Sections 1(4), 3, 3(1), 7, 10, 12, 18, 18(1), 22, 23, 24, 24(1), 24(2) and 62; Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Central Rules, 1998 - Rule 4; Building and Other Construction Workers' Welfare Cess Rules, 1998 - Rules 4, 4(3), 5, 7 to 14; Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers' (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2002; Factories Act, 1948; Mines Act, 1952; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 39, 4

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT578

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta,; Amrita Sanghi,; Devendra Singh and;

S. Muralidhar, J.1. The challenge in these writ petitions, and the connected appeals against interim orders, is to the constitutional validity of:(a) The Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

Mediquip Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Proxima Medical System Gmbh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 433(1), 434 and 434(1)

Reported in : AIR2005SC4175; II(2005)BC366(SC); (SCSuppl)2005(3)CHN56; [2005]124CompCas473(SC); (2005)4CompLJ6(SC); 2005(2)CTC392; JT2005(3)SC380; (2005)7SCC42; [2005]59SCL255(SC); 2005(

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta and; Sarla Chandra, Advs

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Division Bench of the High Court at Calcutta in appeal from an order passed under its original civil jurisdiction being APOT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2004

Jimmy Jahangir Madan Vs. Bolly Cariyappa Hindley (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 205, 273 and 302; Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 495; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 32 and 33; Power of Attorney Act - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2005SC48; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)305; I(2005)BC16; [2005]126CompCas385(SC); 2005CriLJ112; 2004(5)CTC420; 2005(1)KarLJ492; 2004(3)KLT850(SC); (2005)141PLR209; RLW2005(2)SC185; 20

Advocate for Appellant : Dhruv Mehta,; Shalini Gupta and; Mohit Chaudhry, Advs. f

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. These appeals by special leave have been filed against judgment rendered by Karnataka High Court in revision applications upholding order passed by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in two complaint cases whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial