Advanced Search Results

District and Sessions Judge Vs. Ratnesh Kumar Srivastava and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 235 and 335; Subordinate Civil Courts Ministerial Establishment Rules, 1947 - Rule 5; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC724; (2005)2UPLBEC1156

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhir Agarwal and ;Amit Sthalker, Advs.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. These Special Appeals have been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 8.12.2004 staying the operation of the order dated 30th October, 2004 passed by the District Judge, Baghpat, by...

In Re: Champaran Sugar Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas182(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Dhirendra Kumar, Adv., for Dr. B.C. Roy Pharmaceuticals Ltd., ;Sudhir Chandra, ;Tarun Agarwal and ;Geetha Luthra, Advs. for Hanuman Sugar and Industries Ltd., ;J.N. Tewari, Adv. for the company in liq

A.K. Banerji, J. 1. Vide the order dated June 28, 1993, the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ('BIFR' in short) recommended the winding up of the company, Champaran Sugar Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as...

Mukta Arts Limited Vs. Ankit Films a Proprietorship Firm of Sri Anand ...

Court : Patna

Subject : ArbitrationMedia and Communication

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(4), 2(5), 19, 33, 34, 34(3), 36 and 37; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 4; ;Evidence Act; ;Limitation Act; ;Bihar Motion Pictures Association Arbitration Rules; ;Bihar and Jharkhand Motion Pictures Association Arbitration Rules

Advocate for Appellant : Dhirendra Kumar Jha and; Sarvesh Chandra Verma, Advs.

ORDERDharnidhar Jha, J.1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner Company, which was directed by the Arbitrator appointed under Arbitration Rules of Bihar Motion Pictures Association to pay to the opposite party a...

Prem Sagar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6 and 6(3); Urban Development Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Constitution of India - Article 226; Administrative Law

Reported in : 2005(85)DRJ564

Advocate for Appellant : Kirti Uppal, Adv

T.S. Thakur, J.1. The impugned declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued more than 32 years before the filing of these petitions. That kind of delay is manifestly inordinate. The only question...

Mrs. Neena Girish Vs. Bihar State Housing Board and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Aftab Alam, J.1. The petitioner challenges the demand made by the Bihar State Hosing Board ('the Board' hereinafter) for payment of a sum of Rs. 3,19,244.00 as outstanding dues as on 28-2-1999 before it would hand...

Mrs. Kanchan Sanjay Gujar Vs. Mr. Sanjay Bhikan Gujar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Courts Act - Sections 9, 13, 13(1), 13(1A), 19, 23, 23(1) and 26; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 23; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18, 20 and 25

Reported in : AIR2009Bom151; 2009(111)BomLR3459

Advocate for Appellant : Shriram S. Kulkarni, Adv.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act read with Section 23 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ('the Act' for short) arises from the judgment and order dated 10/12/2003...

Dharanidhar Panda and anr. and Muralidhar Nath and anr. Vs. State of O ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : I(2005)ACC333; 2006ACJ487; AIR2005Ori36; 98(2004)CLT706

Advocate for Appellant : Samir Ku. Mishra, S.K. Senapati and K. Ch. Khuntia

A.K. Patnaik, J.1. On the date of Ganesh Puja on 6.9.1997 at about 4 P.M. two school children, namely, Dhirendra Kumar Panda and Mamata Kumari Nath, while playing with other children in Kelikadamba Primary School at...

Quiteria Fernandes and Others Vs. State of Goa, Through Collector and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard. Admit. Ms. P. Kamat, learned Additional Government Advocate waives service for the respondents. 2. By this appeal, the appellants/plaintiffs are challenging the order dated 5/9/2014 (below application Exhibit 13) passed by the learned District...

Abdul Sattar Haji Usman and Another Vs. The Archbishop of Bombay and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The suit seeks declaration of ownership of the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.3 of a plot of land and challenges acquisition of the plot by the State Government under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971 as...

Abhishek Saxena Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : AJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA __

1 REPORTABLE2023INSC1088IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3628 OF2023(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1431/2020) ABHISHEK SAXENA Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) ORDER Leave granted.1. This appeal is...