Advanced Search Results
Suraj Kund Temple and anr. Vs. Rama Kant and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Aug-31-1988
Limitation
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rules 4 and 9; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5 - Schedule - Articles 120 and 121; ;Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1967; ;Punjab High Court Rules - Rules 5, 6 and 7
AIR1989HP59
D.D. Sood and; Chhabil Dass, Advs.
R.S. Thakur, J.1. The facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal are as follows : --The appellant, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, is Suraj Kund Temple deity at Sunder Nagar, which instituted a suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGhungli Vs. Puran
Delhi
Jun-10-1970
Property
Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estate and Land Reform Act, 1953 - Sections 11(2); Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 20
6(1970)DLT433
K.C. Sood,; Chabildas and; Dharam Pal Sood, Advs
Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) This second appeal from the,' order of the learned District Judge, Mandi, raises the question of interpretation of section 11(2) of the Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estate's and Land Reforms Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoshan Lal Vs. State
Delhi
Jun-27-1969
Criminal
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69
1971CriLJ554
Dharam Pal Sood,; Chabildas,; O.P. Sharma and;
H.R. Khanna, J.(1) Roshan Lal and Mela Ram, both aged 22. years, have been convicted by learned Sessions Judge, Kangra, under section 376 Indian Penal Code, and each of them has been sentenced to undergo rigorous...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›