Advanced Search Results

A. Jafferullah Vs. T. Stanes and Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 141

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas759(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Dhanasekaran for K.V. Sridharan, Adv.

Pratap Singh, J. 1. The accused in C.C. No. 356 of 1990, on the file of Judicial Magistrate No. III, Coimbatore, has filed this petition under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call...

Vasanthi Vs. Ramaswami and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ2442

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.S. Dhanasekaran, Adv.

1. This appeal has been preferred by the complainant in a case instituted on her complaint against the respondents for offences under Sections 494 and 495 read with 109, I.P.C. and is directed against the acquittal...

Essorpe Mills Ltd. Vs. Central Provident Fund Commissioner

Court : Chennai

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 22, 22(1) and 22(5); Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A and 7I

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas588(Mad); (2001)IILLJ24Mad

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Dhanasekaran, Adv.

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. In this writ petition the petitioner-company prays for the issue of a writ of certiorari calling for the records in respect of the order dated 15-11-1999, passed by the third respondent in C5/TN/CB/3924/Enf/...

S.R.Selvaraj and Others Vs. Krishna Rathi Ammal and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: K.M.Vijayan, Sr. Counsel for Ms.R.T.Shyamala, Advocates. For the Respondents: R1 and R2, T.Dhanasekaran,R3, R7, D.Sadhasivan, Advocates.

(Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC as against the judgment and decree, dated 06.03.2007, passed by the V Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai, in A.S. No.707 of 2006, confirming the judgment and decree,...

The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Adi Dravidar Welfare Vs. Sorn ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1) and 18

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC171

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ravi, Spl. G.P. (AS) in A.S. No. 532 of 1996, ;T. Dhanasekaran and ;N. Mani Narayana, Advs. in A.S. No. 416 of 1996 and ;A. Nilaphar, Adv. in Cross. Obj. No. 70 of 1998

S. Tamilvanan, J. 1. This appeal in A.S. No. 532 of 1996, A.S. No. 416 of 1996 and Cross Objection in Cross. Objection No. 70 of 1998 are arising out of the same award, passed in...

Commissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. M/S. Vone Technology India

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri C. Dhanasekaran, SDR for the Appellant.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy The respondents are not present despite notice. There is also no adjournment request. Heard the learned SDR Shri C. Dhanasekaran appearing for the Department. The Department is in appeal because the authorities...

Commissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. Metal Scrap Trading Corporation L ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Other Taxes

Advocate for Appellant : Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR

Per Dr.Chittaranjan Satapathy No one is present on behalf of the respondents. Heard Shri Dhanasekaran, appearing for the department. The department has not obtained the necessary CoD clearance for pursuing this appeal against the PSU-respondent. As...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Madurai Vs. Alamelu Tex

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR. Decision on merit

Heard ld. SDR Shri C.Dhanasekaran appearing on behalf of the department. Also perused the written submissions filed by the respondents. In this case, the lower appellate authority has taken into account the submissions by the respondents...

Jayaram Muthukali M/S. Rajeswari Metallurgicals Ltd. M/S. Hemalatha Me ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: R. Raghavan and M. Kannan, Advocates. For the Respondent: C. Dhanasekaran, SDR.

1. Heard both sides. 2. Under the impugned order, the declared description in respect of 39.98 MTs scrap imported as “lead scrap relay” has been discarded and the same has been held as copper scrap and...

Nmvst Alloy Cast Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri R.Balagopal, Consultant. Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR.

Heard both sides. Shri R.Balagopal, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants states that the appellants were not aware that there was service tax liability on them as recipients of the GTA service. As soon as the...