Advanced Search Results

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court Iii a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2 and 4(4); Apprentices Rules, 1991 - Rule 12 and 12(2); Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 6N

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ88All

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Ranjit Saxena

ORDERVineet Saran, J.1. This petition has been filed by the U.P.S.E.B. challenging the award dated August 12, 1983 passed in favour of respondent No. 2 by which the termination of his service has been set aside...

Jag Mohan Singh and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC448

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Pratap Singh, Adv.

M. Katju and S.L. Saraf, JJ.1. Heard Sri Devendra Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel. The petitioner has prayed that the Bandh in U. P. whose call has been given by...

Hare Ram and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1594

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. P. S. Baghel

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. The petitioners applied and were selected as 'Safai Karmis', a Group-D post in the State Government vide select list published in daily newspaper 'Rashtriya Sahara' Gorakhpur dated 13.9.2008, after the interviews in response...

Gajendra Kumar Sharma Vs. General Manager, the Bajpur Co-operative Sug ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 226 and 227; Co-operative Societies Act; Co-operative Societies Rules; Co-operative Societies Regulations; Companies Act; Industrial Dispute Act

Reported in : (1999)3UPLBEC2452

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhanshu Dhulia, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner has prayed for a mandamus commanding the respondents to treat the petitioner as permanent employee instead of seasonal employee on the date when his juniors have been confirmed. The writ petition...

Varanasi Development Authority Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2008(119)FLR736]

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Ajeet Kumar Singh

Bharati Sapru, J.1. Heard Sri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Devendra Pratap Singh holding brief of Sri B.N. Singh for the respondent workman..This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner...

Akhilesh Jaiswal Vs. Madan Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Devendra Pratap Singh, J.1. Heard Sri Ravi Kiran Jain, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ankur Sharma for the petitioner and Sri M.K. Gupta for the respondent-landlord.2. This petition by the tenant is directed against concurrent...

Mohammad Aqil and ors. Vs. Shamiuddin

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Devendra Pratap Singh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition is directed against concurrent judgments dated 20.5.2004 and 21.5.2008 by which both the courts below have decreed the eviction suit filed by the respondent...

Shimbhu Singh Vs. State of U.P

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

Devendra Pratap Singh, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement that he does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the...

Devendra Pratap Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Pande; N.I. Jafri; Vikas Sahai, Advs

1. Heard Sri N.I. Jafri,learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. for the respondent no. 1 and perused the record. None is present for the respondent no. 2. 2. This is an application under...

Ramji and ors. Vs. Ram Lakshaman Janaki Bal Mukund Ji Trust and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Devendra Pratap Singh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. This petition is directed against concurrent judgments dated 31.10.2007 and 12.1.2009 by which both the courts below have decreed the suit filed by the respondent-landlord for...