Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: devendra kumar · Page 1 of about 958 results (0.271 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 20 1996

Munarma Devi Alias Manorama Devi Vs. Gango Devi Alias Gangia Devi and ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-20-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Kumar Sinha, Mahesh Prasad, Anil Kumar Singh, Ayodhya Prasad Sinha, Sudhir Kumar and Ravindra Mohan Prasad, Advs.

B.L. Yadav, J. 1. This is a plaintiffs second appeal in the suit for return of the property, transferred to the defendant under a transaction which was apparently a conditional sale dated 4-7-1979, of a mortgage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1996

Dharam Pal Singh Pipil Vs. Executive Engineer Tubewell Dn. (West)

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-06-1996

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1997)1UPLBEC69

Advocate for Appellant : Dhan Prakash and ;Devendra Kumar, Advs.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner has challenged the order to retire him on superannuation on attainment of the age of 58 years with effect from 30-6-1989 by reason of the Government Order dated 28th July 1987...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2001

Rohitas Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-12-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : U. P. Palika Centralised Services Rules, 1966 - Rule 31; Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC641; [2001(89)FLR574]; (2001)3UPLBEC2064

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Kumar Arora, Adv.

Jagdish Bhalla, J.1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order of termination of his services dated 24.3.1998, contained in Annexure-1 to the writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 27 2006

Cantonment Board and anr. Vs. District Judge (incharge) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-27-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92, 115, 115(1), 115(2), 115(3) and 115(4) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A, 3A, 4 and 10 - Order 43, Rule 1; General Clauses Act;

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3281

Advocate for Appellant : Akhilesh Kalra, Adv.

Devi Prasad Singh, J.1. Controversy relates to interpretation of Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Whether against an order issuing notice to defendants on an application for temporary injunction filed under Order XXXIX, Rules...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2000

Ram Naresh Tripathi Vs. District Inspector of Schools and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-07-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Provision of Payment of Salaries Act, 1971; Secondary Education Commission Act

Reported in : (2000)3UPLBEC2754

A.K. Yog, J.1. Sri Bihari Ji Inter College, Aheripur, District Etawah (called the college at Etawah) is a recognised Intermediate College as contemplated under the provisions of U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and the regulation framed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2006

Bhagwan Das Verma Vs. Ram Briksha Sonar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-01-2006

Subject : Civil

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR335(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V. Shivnath, Sr. Adv. and; A. Sinha, Adv.

Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. The petitioner, in this writ application, has prayed for setting aside the order dated 20.12.2005, passed by Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Koderma in Title Appeal No. 1 of 1991, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2004

Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-10-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 8B and 8C; Commission of Inquiry (Central) Rules, 1972 - Rule 5(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2059

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi, ;V.K. Upadhyay, ;Devendra Kumar Arora and ;Rajesh Shukla, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. We have heard Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, senior advocate assisted by Sri V.K. Upadhyay and Sri Devendra Kumar Arora, advocates for the petitioner and Sri Sudhir Chandra, senior advocate assisted by learned standing counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 1989

Kalyan and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 307 and 452; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 173, 200, 202, 210 and 210(2)

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1658

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Kumar, Adv.

ORDERP. Basu, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by Kalyan and five others with the prayer that suitable directions be issued quashing the judgment and orders dt. 7-4-1989 and 15-12-1989 passed by the magistrate and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2000

Manish Dixit and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 364, 365, 379 and 411; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 82, 83, 165, 166(3) and 482; Evidence Act - Sections 6 and 34

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)793; 2001ALLMR(Cri)392(SC); 2001(1)ALT(Cri)104; 2001CriLJ133; 2000(7)SCALE218; [2000]Supp4SCR74; 2001(2)LC1259(SC)

K.T. Thomas, J.1. A jeweller of Jaipur (Gulshan Makhija) was murdered on his way back home from his jewellery mart. He was abducted by two persons who intercepted the Gypsy (Jeep) driven by him on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2011

M/S Kaso Chemie IndiA. Vs. Assistant Commissioner, Commer.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on : Mar-28-2011

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Rajasthan Sales Tax Act - Sections 86, 37, 29(6) Rule 47 Read With Rule 47; Kerala General Sales Tax Act - Sections 43, 35.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Devendra Kumar; Mr.Dinesh Kumar, Advs.

1. This revision petition has been filed by the assessee under Section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 being aggrieved by the order of learned Tax Board dated 16/8/2004 allowing the Revenue's appeal and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial