Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: devendra dahma · Page 1 of about 13 results (0.021 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 06 1999

Smt. Sharda Devi Vs. Smt. Chamela Devi

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-06-1999

Subject : CivilMotor Vehicles

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : I(2000)ACC596; 2000(1)AWC147

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J. 1. The order dated 4th September, 1999 passed in Misc.Case No. 19 of 1995 arising out of Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 34 of 1992 has since been challenged. By the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2004

Rajni Sharma (Smt.) Vs. Committee of Management of Church City Junior ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-09-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Recognised Basic School (Junior High School) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Teachers) Rules, 1978 - Rules 4 and 20

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC405

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma, Adv.

Arun Tandon, J. 1. Heard Sri Devendra Dahma, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri Piyush Shukla, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. It is not necessary to issue notice to the respondent No. 1 or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1997

Shiv Pratap Singh and Others Vs. Chairman, Town Area Committee, Kishni ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-22-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Twon Area Act - Sections 11

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC533

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dhama, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J.1. Counter and rejoinder-affidavits have been filed, and therefore, this writ petition is being disposed of finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties at the admission stage. Heard Sri Devendra Dahma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2003

Kisan Seva Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-31-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 4K and 10A; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rule 16(2); Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 122; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulations 29, 84, 85 and 86

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1830; [2003(97)FLR995]

Advocate for Appellant : Sudhakar Pandey, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. After several adjournments, this writ petition had come up for hearing on 14.2.2003 and was dismissed in the absence of counsel for petitioner, after hearing Sri Devendra Dahma, counsel for contesting respondent-workman. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2011

Ajit Raizada And Others Vs. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. And Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-21-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14, 309, 162, 226; U.P. Absorption of Retrenched Employees of the State Government or Public Corporation in Government Service Rules, 1991 ; U.P. Retrenched Employees Rules, 1967 - Rule-2(b), 3

Advocate for Appellant : Vikas Budhwar; S.F.A.Naqvi, Advs

1. Heard Sri S.F.A. Naqvi, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1, 3 and 4 and Sri Gopal Chandra Saxena, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 2. The petitioners have sought the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 21 2002

Ved Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-21-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 397 and 482

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2080

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma, Adv.

ORDERU.S. Tripathi, J. 1. This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the order dated 23-8-2002 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 4, Saharanpur in Criminal Revision No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1998

Hind Majdoor Sabha, U.P. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-09-1998

Subject : ServiceLimitation

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1972 - Sections 15, 15(2) and (3) and 17; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 29(2) and 97(1); Special Act

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC126; (2000)IILLJ583All

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma, Adv.

Aloke Chakrabarti, J.1. Two tube-well operators filed an application under Section 15(2) of the Payment of Wages Act through the present petitioner contending that respondent-employers illegally made deductions from their wages for the period between 11.10.1998...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2005

Ajai Kumar Son of Shri Siya Ram Vs. Officer-in-charge, Samyukta Karyal ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-08-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Government Service Law

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC2044; (2005)2UPLBEC1684

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma and ;S.D.N. Singh, Advs.

Ajoy Nath Ray, C.J. and Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Appeal is taken up and summarily disposed of.2. As we have not called for affidavits, allegations in the stay application cannot be taken to be admitted.3. The impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2003

Rajendra Kumar Kapoor Vs. Principal Secretary, (Higher Education) and ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-25-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Service Regulations - Article 370

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2141; (2003)2UPLBEC1160

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma and ;Yogesh Agarwal, Advs.

M. Katju, J.1. This writ petition has been filed for a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 3.8.2001 Annexure-13(a) to the writ petition and for a mandamus directing the respondents to recalculate the pension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2002

Salik Ram Singh Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-10-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 173

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC1813

Advocate for Appellant : Devendra Dahma, Adv.

Anjani Kumar, J.1. By means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner challenges the order dated 17.2.1997, Annexure-3 to the writ petition, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaunpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial