Advanced Search Results
Girwar Lal Vs. Khadi Bhandar Dhuri and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-24-1992
CivilTenancy
East Punjab Urban Real Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13A and 18A(8)
(1992)102PLR676
Raj Paul Kansal, Adv.
V.K. Jhanji, J.1. This, is landlord's revision directed against the order of the Rent Controller, Dhuri, by which petition of the landlord under Section 13-A of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restrictien Act, was dismissed.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtma Ram, S/O Tilak Ram Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-15-1966
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304
AIR1967P& H508; 1967CriLJ1697
Harbhagwan Singh and; R.L. Sharma, Advs.
Shamsher Bahadur, J.1. Atma Ram charged for his wife's murder at about 1-0 p.m. on 6th May 1964, in village Dhaula was found guilty of this offence by the Sessions Judge, Barnala, and has been sentenced...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriental Bank of Commerce and anr. Vs. Bikram Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-28-2009
CivilProperty
(2009)155PLR626
Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of five Regular Second Appeals i.e., (i) RSA Nos. 24 of 2004 (arising out of Civil Appeal No. 151/9.6.2001 and 17.9.2001 in Civil Suit No. 442 of 1998-Bikram...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vishnu Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Delhi
May-25-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 107, 151, 161, 313, 324 and 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 186, 302, 307, 323, 324, 353, 452 and 454; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 27; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27
2001CriLJ4006
Mr. B.S. Rana and; Mr. Raman Sawhney, Advs
ORDERMahmood Ali Khan, J. 1. These four appeals filed by Mahinder, Vishnu, Daulat Ram @ Kalia and Salim @ Langra under Section 374 of the Cr.P.C. are directed against an order of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Saran Singh Vs. Committee of Management, Adarsh GramIn Inter Colle ...
Allahabad
May-17-2002
Service
Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Board Rules, 1998 - Rule 14
2002(3)AWC2005; (2002)3UPLBEC2121
Dev Raj, Adv.
Janardan Sahal, J. 1. The dispute in the present case relates to promotion to the post of Lecturer in Hindi in. Adarsh Gramin Inter College Chandok, Bijnore, which is an institution recognised by the U. P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPraveen Kumar Vs. State and Anr.
Delhi
Mar-04-2015
Criminal
Mr. Dev Raj Sharma
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3452/2014 PRAVEEN KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dev Raj Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ........
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kishan and ors. Vs. Kanwar Papers Private Ltd.
Himachal Pradesh
Dec-22-1988
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 41(2), 155, 155(2), 433, 434 and 439; ;Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960
Dev Raj, Adv.
V.K. Mehrotra, Actg. C.J.1. Kanwar Papers P. Ltd. was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, on January 14, 1981, as a private company limited by shares. Its registered office is at Kala Amb, District Sirmur, in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDev Raj Mahto and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Patna
Sep-24-2002
Criminal
M.L. Visa, J.1. Both these appeals arising out of the same judgment dated 25.11.1997 and order dated 26.11.1997, against which they have been preferred, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurbakhsh Singh Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-16-1959
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 107, 151 and 481; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 228
AIR1960P& H211; 1960CriLJ511
ORDER(1) The record of this case has been submitted to this Court by the learned Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, with the recommendation that the order passed by Shri Dev Raj Gupta, Magistrate, 1st Class, Kapurthala, Campt Phagwara,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDhudku Ganpat Mahajan Vs. Prabhakar Madhavrao Deshpande and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Aug-16-2012
Land Acquisition
The present respondents are the original plaintiffs. They filed suit for possession, declaration and damages. The suit fields are agricultural lands bearing Sy. No.1/2 and Sy. No.54/3. 2. It is contended by the plaintiffs that, one...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »