Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: deo raj · Page 1 of about 45 results (0.049 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 2001

Rafat Umar Vs. Vikas Khurana

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-29-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 3, 3(2) and 4; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 20(2) and (4) and 106; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21; Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1882 - Sections 44 and 45

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC2769

Advocate for Appellant : Deo Raj, Adv.

Janardan Sahai, J.1. This revision is directed against the order of the Judge Small Causes Court, Bijnor dated 9.9.1999 rejecting the application of the defendant-applicant that the suit suffers from mis-joinder of causes of action and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2002

Harnam Singh Vs. Rafiq Hussain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-21-2002

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1008

Advocate for Appellant : Deo Raj, Adv.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. The appellant filed suit for specific performance of contract of sale against the respondent. It was pleaded that the respondent on 13.6.1984 agreed to sell the land in dispute in favour of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2005

Roshan Ali Vs. Mahendra Kumar Verma

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 20(2), 20(4) and 30

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1103

Advocate for Appellant : Deo Raj, Adv.

Vikram Nath, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by the landlord against the judgment and order dated 2.2.2002, passed by the Additional District Judge, Court No. 24, Bijnor, whereby, the revision of the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 27 2005

Smt. Nausaee and ors. Vs. Lyakat and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-27-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act - Sections 5; ;Income Tax Act, 1992 - Sections 30(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2, 2(9), 2(2), 2(9) and 100 - Order 22, Rule 10A - Order 41, Rule 3 and 3A; ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2005All367; 2005(4)AWC3871G

Advocate for Appellant : Deo Raj, Adv.

V.C. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Deo Raj, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri K.M. Garg, learned counsel for the respondents No. 1 to 4, 6 and 7. No one has appeared on behalf of respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 1957

Radha Kishan and anr. Vs. Sapattar Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-07-1957

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 17; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 29

Reported in : AIR1957All406

Advocate for Appellant : Brijlal Gupta, Adv.

Mukerji, J.1. This is a first appeal from order dismissing the objection, of the appellants to an arbitration award.On the 3rd of August 1951 a reference to arbitration was made by Sapattar Singh as party no....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1991

Ram Lakhan Sheo Charan and ors. (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 307; ;Evidence Act - Sections 145 and 157; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 164

Reported in : 1991CriLJ2790

Advocate for Appellant : Iqbal Narain Mulla, ;B.P. Gupta and ;R.P. Singh, Advs.

1. This is an appeal against the judgment and order of First Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, convicting and sentencing each of the appellants to imprisonment for life Under Section 302 read with Section 149, IPC. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2003

U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-2003

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2042

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh D. Khare, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. This case was heard on 15.9.1999 by this Court and after hearing the Court has been pleased to pass the following orders:'Learned Standing Counsel has appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2012

Om Prakash Singh @ Chanhaku Singh Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-19-2012

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28840 of 2011 Om Prakash Singh @ Chanhaku Singh, son of late Deo Raj Singh. Versus The State Of Bihar -------------------------- 03. 19.01.2012 Heard learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2000

U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. Vs. Rati Ram Alias Ram Singh and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-15-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110AA; Motor Vehicles (Amandment) Act, 1988 - Sections 167; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4, 20, 22 and 22(2)

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1194

Advocate for Appellant : Naresh Chandra Rajvanshi, Adv.

U.S. Tripathi, J.1. The first appeal from order has been preferred against the judgment and order/award dated 13.2.1992 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/1st Additional District Judge. Bijnor in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 175 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1893

Kameshar Prasad Vs. Bhikhan NaraIn Singh and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-08-1893

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1893)ILR20Cal609

Pigot, J.1. These appeals are from the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge of Gaya in each of two cases heard before him. Appeal 300 is brought in suit 88 of 1889, appeal 244 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial